Demographics details for Shasta lake, CA vs Carroll, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shasta lake, CA vs Carroll, IA.
Data | Shasta lake | Carroll |
---|---|---|
Population | 10,335 | 10,184 |
Median Age | 38.8 years | 43.7 years |
Median Income | $54,490 | $60,368 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Shasta lake vs Carroll
- In Shasta lake, the population is higher at 10,335, compared to 10,184 in Carroll.
- The median age in Carroll is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 38.8 years in Shasta lake.
- Carroll has a higher median income of $60,368, compared to $54,490 in Shasta lake.
- In Carroll, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 35.0% in Shasta lake.
- Shasta lake has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Carroll.
- The unemployment rate in Shasta lake is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Carroll.
Demographics
Demographics Shasta lake vs Carroll provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Shasta lake | Carroll |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 2 |
White | 74 | 91 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 12 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 2 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Shasta lake vs Carroll
- In Carroll, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Shasta lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Carroll at 91% compared to 74% in Shasta lake.
- Both Shasta lake and Carroll have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Shasta lake at 12% compared to 4% in Carroll.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Shasta lake at 11% compared to 2% in Carroll.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Shasta lake at 2% compared to 0% in Carroll.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Shasta lake | Carroll |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 15.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 9.8% |
Depression | 22.9% | 19.3% |
Smoking | 17.4% | 17.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 21.7% |
Obesity | 32.5% | 39.0% |
Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shasta lake vs Carroll
- More residents in Shasta lake report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 15.5% in Carroll.
- Depression is more prevalent in Shasta lake at 22.9% compared to 19.3% in Carroll.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Shasta lake at 17.4% compared to 17.3% in Carroll.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Carroll at 21.7% compared to 17.5% in Shasta lake.
- Carroll has higher obesity rates at 39.0% compared to 32.5% in Shasta lake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Shasta lake at 25.0% compared to 15.0% in Carroll.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Shasta lake | Carroll |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (67) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 17.0% (1,759) | 22.7% (2,316) |
Less than High School | 11.4% (1,176) | 7.3% (742) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (946) | 17.3% (1,763) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shasta lake vs Carroll
- A higher percentage of residents in Shasta lake have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Carroll.
- In Carroll, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.7% compared to 17.0% in Shasta lake.
- More residents in Shasta lake have less than a high school education at 11.4% compared to 7.3% in Carroll.
- In Carroll, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 9.2% in Shasta lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.