Demographics details for Shasta lake, CA vs Ashfield, MA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Shasta lake, CA vs Ashfield, MA.

Data Shasta lake Ashfield
Population 10,335 1,734
Median Age 38.8 years 45.0 years
Median Income $54,490 $76,000
Married Families 35.0% 70.0%
Poverty Level 12% 8%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 3.0

Population Comparison: Shasta lake vs Ashfield

  • In Shasta lake, the population is higher at 10,335, compared to 1,734 in Ashfield.
  • The median age in Ashfield is higher at 45.0 years, compared to 38.8 years in Shasta lake.
  • Ashfield has a higher median income of $76,000, compared to $54,490 in Shasta lake.
  • In Ashfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 70.0%, compared to 35.0% in Shasta lake.
  • Shasta lake has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Ashfield.
  • The unemployment rate in Shasta lake is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.0% in Ashfield.

Demographics

Demographics Shasta lake vs Ashfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Shasta lake Ashfield
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 74 97.5
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 12 1.5
Two or More Races 11 1
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Shasta lake vs Ashfield

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Shasta lake and Ashfield at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Ashfield at 97.5% compared to 74% in Shasta lake.
  • The Asian population is larger in Shasta lake at 1% compared to 0% in Ashfield.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Shasta lake at 12% compared to 1.5% in Ashfield.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Shasta lake at 11% compared to 1% in Ashfield.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Shasta lake at 2% compared to 0% in Ashfield.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Shasta lake Ashfield
Mental Health Not Good 19.3% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 13.2% Data is updating%
Depression 22.9% Data is updating%
Smoking 17.4% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 17.5% Data is updating%
Obesity 32.5% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 25.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Shasta lake vs Ashfield

  • More residents in Shasta lake report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Shasta lake at 22.9% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Shasta lake at 17.4% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Shasta lake at 17.5% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Shasta lake at 32.5% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Shasta lake at 25.0% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Shasta lake Ashfield
No Schooling 0.6% (67) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 17.0% (1,759) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 11.4% (1,176) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.2% (946) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Shasta lake vs Ashfield

  • A higher percentage of residents in Shasta lake have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Shasta lake hold a high school diploma at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • More residents in Shasta lake have less than a high school education at 11.4% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Shasta lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.2% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.