Demographics details for Sharon, MA vs Ho ho kus, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sharon, MA vs Ho ho kus, NJ.
| Data | Sharon | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,612 | 4,216 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $126,000 | $250,001 |
| Married Families | 62.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 2% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Sharon vs Ho ho kus
- In Sharon, the population is higher at 17,612, compared to 4,216 in Ho ho kus.
- The median age in Ho ho kus is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 40.5 years in Sharon.
- Ho ho kus has a higher median income of $250,001, compared to $126,000 in Sharon.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sharon at 62.0% compared to 52.0% in Ho ho kus.
- Sharon has a higher poverty level at 2% compared to 0% in Ho ho kus.
- The unemployment rate in Sharon is higher at 3.6%, compared to 2.5% in Ho ho kus.
Demographics
Demographics Sharon vs Ho ho kus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sharon | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1.9 | 1 |
| White | 88.2 | 67 |
| Asian | 5.3 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 3.5 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 2.0 | 8 |
| American Indian | 0.1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sharon vs Ho ho kus
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sharon at 1.9% compared to 1% in Ho ho kus.
- Sharon has a higher percentage of White residents at 88.2% compared to 67% in Ho ho kus.
- In Ho ho kus, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 5.3% in Sharon.
- Ho ho kus has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 3.5% in Sharon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ho ho kus at 8%, compared to 2.0% in Sharon.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sharon at 0.1% compared to 0% in Ho ho kus.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sharon | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 11.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 5.8% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 16.6% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 6.9% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 19.6% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 21.9% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sharon vs Ho ho kus
- In Ho ho kus, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 11.2% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ho ho kus at 16.6% versus 0.0% in Sharon.
- Ho ho kus has a higher smoking rate at 6.9% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ho ho kus at 19.6% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- Ho ho kus has higher obesity rates at 21.9% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ho ho kus at 5.0% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sharon | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.8% (117) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.0% (83) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 51.4% (2,167) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sharon vs Ho ho kus
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Sharon and Ho ho kus at 0.0%.
- In Ho ho kus, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 2.8% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ho ho kus at 2.0%, compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- In Ho ho kus, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.4% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.