Demographics details for Shafter, CA vs Point of rocks, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shafter, CA vs Point of rocks, MD.
| Data | Shafter | Point of rocks |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,282 | 2,360 |
| Median Age | 27.4 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $66,418 | $126,944 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Shafter vs Point of rocks
- In Shafter, the population is higher at 21,282, compared to 2,360 in Point of rocks.
- The median age in Point of rocks is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 27.4 years in Shafter.
- Point of rocks has a higher median income of $126,944, compared to $66,418 in Shafter.
- In Point of rocks, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 31.0% in Shafter.
- Shafter has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 0% in Point of rocks.
- The unemployment rate in Shafter is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Point of rocks.
Demographics
Demographics Shafter vs Point of rocks provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shafter | Point of rocks |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 13 |
| White | -9 | 57 |
| Asian | 1 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 78 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 27 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Shafter vs Point of rocks
- In Point of rocks, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 2% in Shafter.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Point of rocks at 57% compared to -9% in Shafter.
- In Point of rocks, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Shafter.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Shafter at 78% compared to 15% in Point of rocks.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Shafter at 27% compared to 9% in Point of rocks.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Shafter at 1% compared to 0% in Point of rocks.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shafter | Point of rocks |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | 7.6% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 12.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | 31.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shafter vs Point of rocks
- More residents in Shafter report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 14.4% in Point of rocks.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 19.7%.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Shafter at 18.3% compared to 12.0% in Point of rocks.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Point of rocks at 17.6% compared to 14.9% in Shafter.
- Obesity rates are higher in Shafter at 39.4% compared to 31.8% in Point of rocks.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Point of rocks at 9.0% compared to 6.0% in Shafter.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shafter | Point of rocks |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (567) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.1% (2,992) | 17.3% (408) |
| Less than High School | 32.9% (6,999) | 5.0% (118) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.7% (1,217) | 28.4% (670) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shafter vs Point of rocks
- A higher percentage of residents in Shafter have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Point of rocks.
- In Point of rocks, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.3% compared to 14.1% in Shafter.
- More residents in Shafter have less than a high school education at 32.9% compared to 5.0% in Point of rocks.
- In Point of rocks, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.4% compared to 5.7% in Shafter.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.