Demographics details for Shafter, CA vs Garden city, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shafter, CA vs Garden city, MI.
| Data | Shafter | Garden city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,282 | 26,815 |
| Median Age | 27.4 years | 40.9 years |
| Median Income | $66,418 | $63,630 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Shafter vs Garden city
- The population in Garden city is higher at 26,815, compared to 21,282 in Shafter.
- The median age in Garden city is higher at 40.9 years, compared to 27.4 years in Shafter.
- Shafter has a higher median income of $66,418 compared to $63,630 in Garden city.
- In Garden city, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 31.0% in Shafter.
- Shafter has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 12% in Garden city.
- The unemployment rate in Shafter is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.2% in Garden city.
Demographics
Demographics Shafter vs Garden city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shafter | Garden city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 6 |
| White | -9 | 82 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 78 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 27 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Shafter vs Garden city
- In Garden city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 2% in Shafter.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Garden city at 82% compared to -9% in Shafter.
- Both Shafter and Garden city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Shafter at 78% compared to 5% in Garden city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Shafter at 27% compared to 6% in Garden city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Shafter at 1% compared to 0% in Garden city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shafter | Garden city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 25.2% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 21.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 19.7% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | 32.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shafter vs Garden city
- More residents in Shafter report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 17.7% in Garden city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Garden city at 25.2% versus 19.7% in Shafter.
- Garden city has a higher smoking rate at 21.5% compared to 18.3% in Shafter.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Garden city at 19.7% compared to 14.9% in Shafter.
- Obesity rates are higher in Shafter at 39.4% compared to 32.1% in Garden city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Garden city at 15.0% compared to 6.0% in Shafter.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shafter | Garden city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (567) | 1.1% (294) |
| High School Diploma | 14.1% (2,992) | 22.7% (6,076) |
| Less than High School | 32.9% (6,999) | 12.9% (3,455) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.7% (1,217) | 10.2% (2,739) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shafter vs Garden city
- A higher percentage of residents in Shafter have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.1% in Garden city.
- In Garden city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.7% compared to 14.1% in Shafter.
- More residents in Shafter have less than a high school education at 32.9% compared to 12.9% in Garden city.
- In Garden city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.2% compared to 5.7% in Shafter.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.