Demographics details for Shafter, CA vs Coleman, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shafter, CA vs Coleman, OK.
| Data | Shafter | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,282 | 297 |
| Median Age | 27.4 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $66,418 | $45,938 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Shafter vs Coleman
- In Shafter, the population is higher at 21,282, compared to 297 in Coleman.
- The median age in Coleman is higher at 39.7 years, compared to 27.4 years in Shafter.
- Shafter has a higher median income of $66,418 compared to $45,938 in Coleman.
- In Coleman, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 31.0% in Shafter.
- Shafter has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 12% in Coleman.
- The unemployment rate in Shafter is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Coleman.
Demographics
Demographics Shafter vs Coleman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shafter | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | -9 | 77 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 78 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 27 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 11 |
Demographics Comparison: Shafter vs Coleman
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Shafter and Coleman at 2%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Coleman at 77% compared to -9% in Shafter.
- The Asian population is larger in Shafter at 1% compared to 0% in Coleman.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Shafter at 78% compared to 1% in Coleman.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Shafter at 27% compared to 9% in Coleman.
- In Coleman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 11%, compared to 1% in Shafter.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shafter | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 26.9% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 29.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shafter vs Coleman
- In Coleman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 18.8% in Shafter.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Coleman at 26.9% versus 19.7% in Shafter.
- Coleman has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 18.3% in Shafter.
- Binge drinking is more common in Shafter at 14.9% compared to 14.8% in Coleman.
- Coleman has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 39.4% in Shafter.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Coleman at 29.0% compared to 6.0% in Shafter.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shafter | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (567) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.1% (2,992) | 28.6% (85) |
| Less than High School | 32.9% (6,999) | 4.0% (12) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.7% (1,217) | 11.1% (33) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shafter vs Coleman
- A higher percentage of residents in Shafter have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Coleman.
- In Coleman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.6% compared to 14.1% in Shafter.
- More residents in Shafter have less than a high school education at 32.9% compared to 4.0% in Coleman.
- In Coleman, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 5.7% in Shafter.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.