Demographics details for Shabbona, IL vs Fairfield, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shabbona, IL vs Fairfield, IA.
| Data | Shabbona | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 850 | 9,464 |
| Median Age | 53.7 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $60,625 | $44,277 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Shabbona vs Fairfield
- The population in Fairfield is higher at 9,464, compared to 850 in Shabbona.
- Residents in Shabbona have a higher median age of 53.7 years compared to 43.0 years in Fairfield.
- Shabbona has a higher median income of $60,625 compared to $44,277 in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Shabbona at 34.0% compared to 32.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairfield at 12%, compared to 8% in Shabbona.
- The unemployment rate in Shabbona is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Shabbona vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shabbona | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 8 |
| White | 94 | 73 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 9 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Shabbona vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 1% in Shabbona.
- Shabbona has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 73% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Shabbona.
- Fairfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Shabbona.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fairfield at 4%, compared to 2% in Shabbona.
- In Fairfield, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Shabbona.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shabbona | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 22.1% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 16.5% | 17.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 36.3% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shabbona vs Fairfield
- More residents in Shabbona report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 15.5% in Fairfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Shabbona at 22.1% compared to 20.1% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher smoking rate at 17.1% compared to 16.5% in Shabbona.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairfield at 19.8% compared to 18.8% in Shabbona.
- Fairfield has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 36.3% in Shabbona.
- Disability percentages are higher in Shabbona at 24.0% compared to 13.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shabbona | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.1% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 22.1% (188) | 12.1% (1,145) |
| Less than High School | 7.6% (65) | 6.3% (594) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (104) | 38.1% (3,604) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shabbona vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Shabbona.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shabbona hold a high school diploma at 22.1% compared to 12.1% in Fairfield.
- More residents in Shabbona have less than a high school education at 7.6% compared to 6.3% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 12.2% in Shabbona.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.