Demographics details for Seymour, IN vs Mcdonough, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Seymour, IN vs Mcdonough, GA.
Data | Seymour | Mcdonough |
---|---|---|
Population | 21,618 | 30,340 |
Median Age | 34.5 years | 31.0 years |
Median Income | $57,347 | $77,804 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Seymour vs Mcdonough
- The population in Mcdonough is higher at 30,340, compared to 21,618 in Seymour.
- Residents in Seymour have a higher median age of 34.5 years compared to 31.0 years in Mcdonough.
- Mcdonough has a higher median income of $77,804, compared to $57,347 in Seymour.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Seymour at 32.0% compared to 31.0% in Mcdonough.
- The poverty level is higher in Mcdonough at 13%, compared to 12% in Seymour.
- Mcdonough has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 3.5% in Seymour.
Demographics
Demographics Seymour vs Mcdonough provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Seymour | Mcdonough |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 70 |
White | 68 | 14 |
Asian | 3 | 2 |
Hispanic | 15 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Seymour vs Mcdonough
- In Mcdonough, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 2% in Seymour.
- Seymour has a higher percentage of White residents at 68% compared to 14% in Mcdonough.
- The Asian population is larger in Seymour at 3% compared to 2% in Mcdonough.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Seymour at 15% compared to 6% in Mcdonough.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Seymour at 11% compared to 8% in Mcdonough.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Seymour at 1% compared to 0% in Mcdonough.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Seymour | Mcdonough |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 16.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 11.6% |
Depression | 26.9% | 19.6% |
Smoking | 21.5% | 16.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 15.1% |
Obesity | 42.2% | 39.5% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Seymour vs Mcdonough
- More residents in Seymour report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.4% in Mcdonough.
- Depression is more prevalent in Seymour at 26.9% compared to 19.6% in Mcdonough.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Seymour at 21.5% compared to 16.1% in Mcdonough.
- Binge drinking is more common in Seymour at 16.3% compared to 15.1% in Mcdonough.
- Obesity rates are higher in Seymour at 42.2% compared to 39.5% in Mcdonough.
- Disability percentages are higher in Seymour at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in Mcdonough.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Seymour | Mcdonough |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (348) | 0.7% (221) |
High School Diploma | 20.2% (4,374) | 14.8% (4,501) |
Less than High School | 17.4% (3,765) | 4.9% (1,500) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (2,648) | 16.1% (4,882) |
Education Levels Comparison: Seymour vs Mcdonough
- A higher percentage of residents in Seymour have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.7% in Mcdonough.
- A higher percentage of residents in Seymour hold a high school diploma at 20.2% compared to 14.8% in Mcdonough.
- More residents in Seymour have less than a high school education at 17.4% compared to 4.9% in Mcdonough.
- In Mcdonough, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.1% compared to 12.2% in Seymour.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.