Demographics details for Severna park, MD vs Union city, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Severna park, MD vs Union city, GA.

Data Severna park Union city
Population 40,452 27,895
Median Age 41.5 years 32.7 years
Median Income $164,288 $46,696
Married Families 48.0% 17.0%
Poverty Level 3% 16%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 6.1

Population Comparison: Severna park vs Union city

  • In Severna park, the population is higher at 40,452, compared to 27,895 in Union city.
  • Residents in Severna park have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 32.7 years in Union city.
  • Severna park has a higher median income of $164,288 compared to $46,696 in Union city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Severna park at 48.0% compared to 17.0% in Union city.
  • The poverty level is higher in Union city at 16%, compared to 3% in Severna park.
  • Union city has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 3.2% in Severna park.

Demographics

Demographics Severna park vs Union city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Severna park Union city
Black 3 85
White 86 6
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 3 5
Two or More Races 5 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Severna park vs Union city

  • In Union city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 85% compared to 3% in Severna park.
  • Severna park has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 6% in Union city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Severna park at 3% compared to 0% in Union city.
  • Union city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Severna park.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Severna park at 5% compared to 4% in Union city.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Severna park and Union city at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Severna park Union city
Mental Health Not Good 13.1% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 7.3% 12.2%
Depression 19.9% 17.2%
Smoking 9.0% 18.0%
Binge Drinking 18.4% 13.5%
Obesity 31.9% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Severna park vs Union city

  • In Union city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 13.1% in Severna park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Severna park at 19.9% compared to 17.2% in Union city.
  • Union city has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Severna park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Severna park at 18.4% compared to 13.5% in Union city.
  • Union city has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 31.9% in Severna park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Union city at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Severna park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Severna park Union city
No Schooling 0.4% (145) 0.5% (129)
High School Diploma 10.9% (4,392) 13.2% (3,681)
Less than High School 4.3% (1,731) 7.8% (2,166)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 38.1% (15,411) 17.3% (4,828)

Education Levels Comparison: Severna park vs Union city

  • In Union city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Severna park.
  • In Union city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.2% compared to 10.9% in Severna park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Union city at 7.8%, compared to 4.3% in Severna park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Severna park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 17.3% in Union city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.