Demographics details for Severna park, MD vs Decker, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Severna park, MD vs Decker, MI.
| Data | Severna park | Decker |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 40,452 | 953 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $164,288 | $56,875 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 3% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Severna park vs Decker
- In Severna park, the population is higher at 40,452, compared to 953 in Decker.
- Residents in Severna park have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 35.1 years in Decker.
- Severna park has a higher median income of $164,288 compared to $56,875 in Decker.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Severna park at 48.0% compared to 41.0% in Decker.
- The poverty level is higher in Decker at 9%, compared to 3% in Severna park.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Severna park and Decker at 3.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Severna park vs Decker provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Severna park | Decker |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 86 | 98 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Severna park vs Decker
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Severna park at 3% compared to 1% in Decker.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Decker at 98% compared to 86% in Severna park.
- The Asian population is larger in Severna park at 3% compared to 0% in Decker.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Severna park at 3% compared to 0% in Decker.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Severna park at 5% compared to 1% in Decker.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Severna park and Decker at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Severna park | Decker |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.1% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.3% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 19.9% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 9.0% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 31.9% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Severna park vs Decker
- More residents in Severna park report poor mental health at 13.1% compared to 0.0% in Decker.
- Depression is more prevalent in Severna park at 19.9% compared to 0.0% in Decker.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Severna park at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Decker.
- Binge drinking is more common in Severna park at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Decker.
- Obesity rates are higher in Severna park at 31.9% compared to 0.0% in Decker.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Severna park and Decker at 8.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Severna park | Decker |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (145) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 10.9% (4,392) | 19.9% (190) |
| Less than High School | 4.3% (1,731) | 17.0% (162) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.1% (15,411) | 6.9% (66) |
Education Levels Comparison: Severna park vs Decker
- A higher percentage of residents in Severna park have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Decker.
- In Decker, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.9% compared to 10.9% in Severna park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Decker at 17.0%, compared to 4.3% in Severna park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Severna park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 6.9% in Decker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.