Demographics details for Severna park, MD vs Chicago, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Severna park, MD vs Chicago, IL.
| Data | Severna park | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 40,452 | 2,665,039 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $164,288 | $71,673 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 3% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 7.1 |
Population Comparison: Severna park vs Chicago
- The population in Chicago is higher at 2,665,039, compared to 40,452 in Severna park.
- Residents in Severna park have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 35.3 years in Chicago.
- Severna park has a higher median income of $164,288 compared to $71,673 in Chicago.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Severna park at 48.0% compared to 30.0% in Chicago.
- The poverty level is higher in Chicago at 18%, compared to 3% in Severna park.
- Chicago has a higher unemployment rate at 7.1% compared to 3.2% in Severna park.
Demographics
Demographics Severna park vs Chicago provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Severna park | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 29 |
| White | 86 | 23 |
| Asian | 3 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Severna park vs Chicago
- In Chicago, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 3% in Severna park.
- Severna park has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 23% in Chicago.
- In Chicago, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 3% in Severna park.
- Chicago has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 3% in Severna park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chicago at 10%, compared to 5% in Severna park.
- In Chicago, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Severna park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Severna park | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.1% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.3% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 16.3% |
| Smoking | 9.0% | 15.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 31.9% | 34.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Severna park vs Chicago
- In Chicago, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.5% compared to 13.1% in Severna park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Severna park at 19.9% compared to 16.3% in Chicago.
- Chicago has a higher smoking rate at 15.1% compared to 9.0% in Severna park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Severna park at 18.4% compared to 16.5% in Chicago.
- Chicago has higher obesity rates at 34.1% compared to 31.9% in Severna park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chicago at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Severna park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Severna park | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (145) | 1.7% (44,697) |
| High School Diploma | 10.9% (4,392) | 13.3% (354,780) |
| Less than High School | 4.3% (1,731) | 15.8% (419,784) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.1% (15,411) | 30.4% (811,024) |
Education Levels Comparison: Severna park vs Chicago
- In Chicago, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.4% in Severna park.
- In Chicago, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.3% compared to 10.9% in Severna park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chicago at 15.8%, compared to 4.3% in Severna park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Severna park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 30.4% in Chicago.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.