Demographics details for Severna park, MD vs Carrboro, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Severna park, MD vs Carrboro, NC.
Data | Severna park | Carrboro |
---|---|---|
Population | 40,452 | 21,298 |
Median Age | 41.5 years | 33.1 years |
Median Income | $164,288 | $76,933 |
Married Families | 48.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 3% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Severna park vs Carrboro
- In Severna park, the population is higher at 40,452, compared to 21,298 in Carrboro.
- Residents in Severna park have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 33.1 years in Carrboro.
- Severna park has a higher median income of $164,288 compared to $76,933 in Carrboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Severna park at 48.0% compared to 38.0% in Carrboro.
- The poverty level is higher in Carrboro at 12%, compared to 3% in Severna park.
- Carrboro has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Severna park.
Demographics
Demographics Severna park vs Carrboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Severna park | Carrboro |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 14 |
White | 86 | 61 |
Asian | 3 | 9 |
Hispanic | 3 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Severna park vs Carrboro
- In Carrboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 3% in Severna park.
- Severna park has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 61% in Carrboro.
- In Carrboro, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 3% in Severna park.
- Carrboro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 3% in Severna park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Carrboro at 7%, compared to 5% in Severna park.
- In Carrboro, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Severna park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Severna park | Carrboro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.1% | 13.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.3% | 8.2% |
Depression | 19.9% | 20.5% |
Smoking | 9.0% | 10.3% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 17.5% |
Obesity | 31.9% | 27.4% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Severna park vs Carrboro
- More residents in Severna park report poor mental health at 13.1% compared to 13.0% in Carrboro.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carrboro at 20.5% versus 19.9% in Severna park.
- Carrboro has a higher smoking rate at 10.3% compared to 9.0% in Severna park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Severna park at 18.4% compared to 17.5% in Carrboro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Severna park at 31.9% compared to 27.4% in Carrboro.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Severna park and Carrboro at 8.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Severna park | Carrboro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (145) | 1.3% (273) |
High School Diploma | 10.9% (4,392) | 4.1% (868) |
Less than High School | 4.3% (1,731) | 4.6% (984) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.1% (15,411) | 46.7% (9,945) |
Education Levels Comparison: Severna park vs Carrboro
- In Carrboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.4% in Severna park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Severna park hold a high school diploma at 10.9% compared to 4.1% in Carrboro.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carrboro at 4.6%, compared to 4.3% in Severna park.
- In Carrboro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.7% compared to 38.1% in Severna park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.