Demographics details for Severna park, MD vs Anderson, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Severna park, MD vs Anderson, IN.
| Data | Severna park | Anderson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 40,452 | 55,099 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $164,288 | $44,974 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 3% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Severna park vs Anderson
- The population in Anderson is higher at 55,099, compared to 40,452 in Severna park.
- Residents in Severna park have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 38.8 years in Anderson.
- Severna park has a higher median income of $164,288 compared to $44,974 in Anderson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Severna park at 48.0% compared to 31.0% in Anderson.
- The poverty level is higher in Anderson at 12%, compared to 3% in Severna park.
- Anderson has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.2% in Severna park.
Demographics
Demographics Severna park vs Anderson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Severna park | Anderson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 15 |
| White | 86 | 72 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Severna park vs Anderson
- In Anderson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 3% in Severna park.
- Severna park has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 72% in Anderson.
- The Asian population is larger in Severna park at 3% compared to 1% in Anderson.
- Anderson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 3% in Severna park.
- Both Severna park and Anderson have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Severna park and Anderson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Severna park | Anderson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.1% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.3% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 27.1% |
| Smoking | 9.0% | 25.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 31.9% | 46.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Severna park vs Anderson
- In Anderson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 13.1% in Severna park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Anderson at 27.1% versus 19.9% in Severna park.
- Anderson has a higher smoking rate at 25.1% compared to 9.0% in Severna park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Severna park at 18.4% compared to 15.0% in Anderson.
- Anderson has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 31.9% in Severna park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Anderson at 22.0% compared to 8.0% in Severna park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Severna park | Anderson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (145) | 0.8% (436) |
| High School Diploma | 10.9% (4,392) | 22.3% (12,278) |
| Less than High School | 4.3% (1,731) | 15.8% (8,680) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.1% (15,411) | 11.1% (6,109) |
Education Levels Comparison: Severna park vs Anderson
- In Anderson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Severna park.
- In Anderson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.3% compared to 10.9% in Severna park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Anderson at 15.8%, compared to 4.3% in Severna park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Severna park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 11.1% in Anderson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.