Demographics details for Senoia, GA vs Maple valley, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Senoia, GA vs Maple valley, WA.
| Data | Senoia | Maple valley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,663 | 28,220 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $114,423 | $137,595 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 3% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Senoia vs Maple valley
- The population in Maple valley is higher at 28,220, compared to 5,663 in Senoia.
- The median age in Maple valley is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 35.8 years in Senoia.
- Maple valley has a higher median income of $137,595, compared to $114,423 in Senoia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Senoia at 48.0% compared to 47.0% in Maple valley.
- Senoia has a higher poverty level at 3% compared to 0% in Maple valley.
- Maple valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.0% in Senoia.
Demographics
Demographics Senoia vs Maple valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Senoia | Maple valley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 16 | 2 |
| White | 74 | 74 |
| Asian | 1 | 11 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Senoia vs Maple valley
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Senoia at 16% compared to 2% in Maple valley.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Senoia and Maple valley at 74%.
- In Maple valley, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 1% in Senoia.
- Maple valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Senoia.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Maple valley at 8%, compared to 6% in Senoia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Senoia and Maple valley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Senoia | Maple valley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 15.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 8.6% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 25.8% |
| Smoking | 13.2% | 9.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 19.6% |
| Obesity | 32.0% | 24.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Senoia vs Maple valley
- In Maple valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 15.0% in Senoia.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Maple valley at 25.8% versus 20.5% in Senoia.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Senoia at 13.2% compared to 9.4% in Maple valley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Maple valley at 19.6% compared to 17.5% in Senoia.
- Obesity rates are higher in Senoia at 32.0% compared to 24.3% in Maple valley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Senoia at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Maple valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Senoia | Maple valley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (24) | 0.4% (103) |
| High School Diploma | 10.0% (564) | 10.2% (2,878) |
| Less than High School | 4.6% (258) | 3.1% (879) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.6% (1,788) | 28.5% (8,032) |
Education Levels Comparison: Senoia vs Maple valley
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Senoia and Maple valley at 0.4%.
- In Maple valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.2% compared to 10.0% in Senoia.
- More residents in Senoia have less than a high school education at 4.6% compared to 3.1% in Maple valley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Senoia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.6% compared to 28.5% in Maple valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.