Demographics details for Senoia, GA vs Klamath falls, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Senoia, GA vs Klamath falls, OR.
| Data | Senoia | Klamath falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,663 | 21,977 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $114,423 | $46,695 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 3% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Senoia vs Klamath falls
- The population in Klamath falls is higher at 21,977, compared to 5,663 in Senoia.
- Residents in Senoia have a higher median age of 35.8 years compared to 35.1 years in Klamath falls.
- Senoia has a higher median income of $114,423 compared to $46,695 in Klamath falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Senoia at 48.0% compared to 31.0% in Klamath falls.
- The poverty level is higher in Klamath falls at 18%, compared to 3% in Senoia.
- Klamath falls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.0% in Senoia.
Demographics
Demographics Senoia vs Klamath falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Senoia | Klamath falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 16 | 1 |
| White | 74 | 69 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Senoia vs Klamath falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Senoia at 16% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
- Senoia has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 69% in Klamath falls.
- Both Senoia and Klamath falls have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Klamath falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 3% in Senoia.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Klamath falls at 11%, compared to 6% in Senoia.
- In Klamath falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Senoia.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Senoia | Klamath falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 28.4% |
| Smoking | 13.2% | 19.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 32.0% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Senoia vs Klamath falls
- In Klamath falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 15.0% in Senoia.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Klamath falls at 28.4% versus 20.5% in Senoia.
- Klamath falls has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 13.2% in Senoia.
- Binge drinking is more common in Senoia at 17.5% compared to 15.8% in Klamath falls.
- Klamath falls has higher obesity rates at 35.9% compared to 32.0% in Senoia.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Klamath falls at 20.0% compared to 8.0% in Senoia.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Senoia | Klamath falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (24) | 0.9% (192) |
| High School Diploma | 10.0% (564) | 16.0% (3,508) |
| Less than High School | 4.6% (258) | 15.5% (3,401) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.6% (1,788) | 14.4% (3,175) |
Education Levels Comparison: Senoia vs Klamath falls
- In Klamath falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Senoia.
- In Klamath falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Senoia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Klamath falls at 15.5%, compared to 4.6% in Senoia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Senoia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.6% compared to 14.4% in Klamath falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.