Demographics details for Senecaville, OH vs Leitchfield, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Senecaville, OH vs Leitchfield, KY.

Data Senecaville Leitchfield
Population 415 6,432
Median Age 36.4 years 38.8 years
Median Income $48,036 $43,214
Married Families 43.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level 10% 14%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Senecaville vs Leitchfield

  • The population in Leitchfield is higher at 6,432, compared to 415 in Senecaville.
  • The median age in Leitchfield is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 36.4 years in Senecaville.
  • Senecaville has a higher median income of $48,036 compared to $43,214 in Leitchfield.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Senecaville at 43.0% compared to 25.0% in Leitchfield.
  • The poverty level is higher in Leitchfield at 14%, compared to 10% in Senecaville.
  • The unemployment rate in Senecaville is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Leitchfield.

Demographics

Demographics Senecaville vs Leitchfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Senecaville Leitchfield
Black 3 2
White 89 95
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 1 Data is updating
Two or More Races 7 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Senecaville vs Leitchfield

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Senecaville at 3% compared to 2% in Leitchfield.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Leitchfield at 95% compared to 89% in Senecaville.
  • Both Senecaville and Leitchfield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Senecaville at 1% compared to 0% in Leitchfield.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Senecaville at 7% compared to 3% in Leitchfield.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Senecaville and Leitchfield at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Senecaville Leitchfield
Mental Health Not Good 18.4% 21.3%
Physical Health Not Good 13.1% 16.7%
Depression 24.5% 30.0%
Smoking 22.6% 27.5%
Binge Drinking 18.7% 14.1%
Obesity 42.9% 41.5%
Disability Percentage 26.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Senecaville vs Leitchfield

  • In Leitchfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 18.4% in Senecaville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Leitchfield at 30.0% versus 24.5% in Senecaville.
  • Leitchfield has a higher smoking rate at 27.5% compared to 22.6% in Senecaville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Senecaville at 18.7% compared to 14.1% in Leitchfield.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Senecaville at 42.9% compared to 41.5% in Leitchfield.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Senecaville at 26.0% compared to 16.0% in Leitchfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Senecaville Leitchfield
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.3% (21)
High School Diploma 31.3% (130) 28.3% (1,821)
Less than High School 19.3% (80) 23.4% (1,504)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 5.3% (22) 8.4% (540)

Education Levels Comparison: Senecaville vs Leitchfield

  • In Leitchfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Senecaville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Senecaville hold a high school diploma at 31.3% compared to 28.3% in Leitchfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Leitchfield at 23.4%, compared to 19.3% in Senecaville.
  • In Leitchfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.4% compared to 5.3% in Senecaville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.