Demographics details for Selma, OR vs Stonington, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Selma, OR vs Stonington, CT.
Data | Selma | Stonington |
---|---|---|
Population | 892 | 18,545 |
Median Age | 36.6 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $42,319 | $92,222 |
Married Families | 54.0% | 60.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Selma vs Stonington
- The population in Stonington is higher at 18,545, compared to 892 in Selma.
- The median age in Stonington is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 36.6 years in Selma.
- Stonington has a higher median income of $92,222, compared to $42,319 in Selma.
- In Stonington, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 54.0% in Selma.
- Selma has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 5% in Stonington.
- The unemployment rate in Selma is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.2% in Stonington.
Demographics
Demographics Selma vs Stonington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Selma | Stonington |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 2 |
White | 95 | 90 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 1 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Selma vs Stonington
- In Stonington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Selma.
- Selma has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 90% in Stonington.
- In Stonington, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Selma.
- Stonington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Selma.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Selma at 4% compared to 2% in Stonington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Selma and Stonington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Selma | Stonington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 26.9% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 17.0% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 30.7% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 28.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Selma vs Stonington
- More residents in Selma report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Selma at 26.9% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Selma at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Selma at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Selma at 30.7% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Selma at 28.0% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Selma | Stonington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (13) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 15.9% (142) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 8.3% (74) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 1.7% (15) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Selma vs Stonington
- A higher percentage of residents in Selma have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Selma hold a high school diploma at 15.9% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
- More residents in Selma have less than a high school education at 8.3% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Selma hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.