Demographics details for Selma, CA vs Washington, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Selma, CA vs Washington, IN.
| Data | Selma | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,430 | 12,171 |
| Median Age | 31.3 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $53,874 | $48,255 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Selma vs Washington
- In Selma, the population is higher at 24,430, compared to 12,171 in Washington.
- The median age in Washington is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 31.3 years in Selma.
- Selma has a higher median income of $53,874 compared to $48,255 in Washington.
- In Washington, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 30.0% in Selma.
- Selma has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 12% in Washington.
- The unemployment rate in Selma is higher at 6.5%, compared to 3.2% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Selma vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Selma | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 4 |
| White | -2 | 76 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 84 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Selma vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Selma.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Washington at 76% compared to -2% in Selma.
- The Asian population is larger in Selma at 3% compared to 0% in Washington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Selma at 84% compared to 12% in Washington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Selma at 13% compared to 8% in Washington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Selma at 1% compared to 0% in Washington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Selma | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 17.4% | 27.6% |
| Smoking | 15.7% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | 36.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Selma vs Washington
- In Washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 18.0% in Selma.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Washington at 27.6% versus 17.4% in Selma.
- Washington has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 15.7% in Selma.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Washington at 16.3% compared to 13.6% in Selma.
- Obesity rates are higher in Selma at 40.5% compared to 36.4% in Washington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Washington at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Selma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Selma | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.8% (938) | 1.3% (163) |
| High School Diploma | 14.6% (3,577) | 22.8% (2,771) |
| Less than High School | 33.9% (8,285) | 20.2% (2,460) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (1,712) | 9.3% (1,129) |
Education Levels Comparison: Selma vs Washington
- A higher percentage of residents in Selma have no formal schooling at 3.8% compared to 1.3% in Washington.
- In Washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.8% compared to 14.6% in Selma.
- More residents in Selma have less than a high school education at 33.9% compared to 20.2% in Washington.
- In Washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.3% compared to 7.0% in Selma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.