Demographics details for Selma, CA vs Port gibson, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Selma, CA vs Port gibson, MS.
| Data | Selma | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,430 | 1,206 |
| Median Age | 31.3 years | 47.3 years |
| Median Income | $53,874 | $24,773 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 22.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Selma vs Port gibson
- In Selma, the population is higher at 24,430, compared to 1,206 in Port gibson.
- The median age in Port gibson is higher at 47.3 years, compared to 31.3 years in Selma.
- Selma has a higher median income of $53,874 compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Selma at 30.0% compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
- The poverty level is higher in Port gibson at 30%, compared to 20% in Selma.
- The unemployment rate in Selma is higher at 6.5%, compared to 5.3% in Port gibson.
Demographics
Demographics Selma vs Port gibson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Selma | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 82 |
| White | -2 | 12 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 84 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Selma vs Port gibson
- In Port gibson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 82% compared to 1% in Selma.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Port gibson at 12% compared to -2% in Selma.
- The Asian population is larger in Selma at 3% compared to 0% in Port gibson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Selma at 84% compared to 0% in Port gibson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Selma at 13% compared to 6% in Port gibson.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Selma at 1% compared to 0% in Port gibson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Selma | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 16.0% |
| Depression | 17.4% | 20.0% |
| Smoking | 15.7% | 24.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 10.2% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | 50.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Selma vs Port gibson
- In Port gibson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.0% in Selma.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Port gibson at 20.0% versus 17.4% in Selma.
- Port gibson has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 15.7% in Selma.
- Binge drinking is more common in Selma at 13.6% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
- Port gibson has higher obesity rates at 50.5% compared to 40.5% in Selma.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 12.0% in Selma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Selma | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.8% (938) | 0.5% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 14.6% (3,577) | 9.8% (118) |
| Less than High School | 33.9% (8,285) | 13.3% (160) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (1,712) | 21.2% (256) |
Education Levels Comparison: Selma vs Port gibson
- A higher percentage of residents in Selma have no formal schooling at 3.8% compared to 0.5% in Port gibson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Selma hold a high school diploma at 14.6% compared to 9.8% in Port gibson.
- More residents in Selma have less than a high school education at 33.9% compared to 13.3% in Port gibson.
- In Port gibson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 7.0% in Selma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.