Demographics details for Selma, CA vs Leavenworth, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Selma, CA vs Leavenworth, WA.
| Data | Selma | Leavenworth |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,430 | 2,422 |
| Median Age | 31.3 years | 40.9 years |
| Median Income | $53,874 | $66,042 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Selma vs Leavenworth
- In Selma, the population is higher at 24,430, compared to 2,422 in Leavenworth.
- The median age in Leavenworth is higher at 40.9 years, compared to 31.3 years in Selma.
- Leavenworth has a higher median income of $66,042, compared to $53,874 in Selma.
- In Leavenworth, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 30.0% in Selma.
- Selma has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 7% in Leavenworth.
- The unemployment rate in Selma is higher at 6.5%, compared to 4.5% in Leavenworth.
Demographics
Demographics Selma vs Leavenworth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Selma | Leavenworth |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | -2 | 87 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 84 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Selma vs Leavenworth
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Selma and Leavenworth at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Leavenworth at 87% compared to -2% in Selma.
- The Asian population is larger in Selma at 3% compared to 1% in Leavenworth.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Selma at 84% compared to 7% in Leavenworth.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Selma at 13% compared to 4% in Leavenworth.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Selma at 1% compared to 0% in Leavenworth.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Selma | Leavenworth |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 17.4% | 26.5% |
| Smoking | 15.7% | 12.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | 28.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Selma vs Leavenworth
- More residents in Selma report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.2% in Leavenworth.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Leavenworth at 26.5% versus 17.4% in Selma.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Selma at 15.7% compared to 12.1% in Leavenworth.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Leavenworth at 18.9% compared to 13.6% in Selma.
- Obesity rates are higher in Selma at 40.5% compared to 28.2% in Leavenworth.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Leavenworth at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Selma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Selma | Leavenworth |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.8% (938) | 0.2% (5) |
| High School Diploma | 14.6% (3,577) | 11.3% (273) |
| Less than High School | 33.9% (8,285) | 9.0% (218) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (1,712) | 36.2% (876) |
Education Levels Comparison: Selma vs Leavenworth
- A higher percentage of residents in Selma have no formal schooling at 3.8% compared to 0.2% in Leavenworth.
- A higher percentage of residents in Selma hold a high school diploma at 14.6% compared to 11.3% in Leavenworth.
- More residents in Selma have less than a high school education at 33.9% compared to 9.0% in Leavenworth.
- In Leavenworth, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.2% compared to 7.0% in Selma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.