Demographics details for Selma, CA vs Grand prairie, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Selma, CA vs Grand prairie, TX.
| Data | Selma | Grand prairie |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,430 | 201,843 |
| Median Age | 31.3 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $53,874 | $76,626 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Selma vs Grand prairie
- The population in Grand prairie is higher at 201,843, compared to 24,430 in Selma.
- The median age in Grand prairie is higher at 33.7 years, compared to 31.3 years in Selma.
- Grand prairie has a higher median income of $76,626, compared to $53,874 in Selma.
- In Grand prairie, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 30.0% in Selma.
- Selma has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 14% in Grand prairie.
- The unemployment rate in Selma is higher at 6.5%, compared to 4.5% in Grand prairie.
Demographics
Demographics Selma vs Grand prairie provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Selma | Grand prairie |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 23 |
| White | -2 | 9 |
| Asian | 3 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 84 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 14 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Selma vs Grand prairie
- In Grand prairie, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 1% in Selma.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grand prairie at 9% compared to -2% in Selma.
- In Grand prairie, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 3% in Selma.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Selma at 84% compared to 46% in Grand prairie.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grand prairie at 14%, compared to 13% in Selma.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Selma and Grand prairie at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Selma | Grand prairie |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 17.4% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 15.7% | 16.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Selma vs Grand prairie
- More residents in Selma report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.5% in Grand prairie.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Grand prairie at 21.4% versus 17.4% in Selma.
- Grand prairie has a higher smoking rate at 16.1% compared to 15.7% in Selma.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grand prairie at 17.3% compared to 13.6% in Selma.
- Obesity rates are higher in Selma at 40.5% compared to 34.9% in Grand prairie.
- Disability percentages are higher in Selma at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Grand prairie.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Selma | Grand prairie |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.8% (938) | 2.2% (4,493) |
| High School Diploma | 14.6% (3,577) | 12.9% (26,069) |
| Less than High School | 33.9% (8,285) | 21.3% (43,014) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (1,712) | 16.4% (33,151) |
Education Levels Comparison: Selma vs Grand prairie
- A higher percentage of residents in Selma have no formal schooling at 3.8% compared to 2.2% in Grand prairie.
- A higher percentage of residents in Selma hold a high school diploma at 14.6% compared to 12.9% in Grand prairie.
- More residents in Selma have less than a high school education at 33.9% compared to 21.3% in Grand prairie.
- In Grand prairie, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 7.0% in Selma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.