Demographics details for Selma, CA vs Bloomington, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Selma, CA vs Bloomington, IN.
| Data | Selma | Bloomington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,430 | 79,107 |
| Median Age | 31.3 years | 24.4 years |
| Median Income | $53,874 | $46,543 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 6.2 |
Population Comparison: Selma vs Bloomington
- The population in Bloomington is higher at 79,107, compared to 24,430 in Selma.
- Residents in Selma have a higher median age of 31.3 years compared to 24.4 years in Bloomington.
- Selma has a higher median income of $53,874 compared to $46,543 in Bloomington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Selma at 30.0% compared to 23.0% in Bloomington.
- Selma has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 18% in Bloomington.
- The unemployment rate in Selma is higher at 6.5%, compared to 6.2% in Bloomington.
Demographics
Demographics Selma vs Bloomington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Selma | Bloomington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 5 |
| White | -2 | 75 |
| Asian | 3 | 11 |
| Hispanic | 84 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Selma vs Bloomington
- In Bloomington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Selma.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bloomington at 75% compared to -2% in Selma.
- In Bloomington, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 3% in Selma.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Selma at 84% compared to 4% in Bloomington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Selma at 13% compared to 5% in Bloomington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Selma at 1% compared to 0% in Bloomington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Selma | Bloomington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 17.4% | 26.7% |
| Smoking | 15.7% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Selma vs Bloomington
- More residents in Selma report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 17.6% in Bloomington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bloomington at 26.7% versus 17.4% in Selma.
- Bloomington has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 15.7% in Selma.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bloomington at 16.7% compared to 13.6% in Selma.
- Obesity rates are higher in Selma at 40.5% compared to 34.4% in Bloomington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Selma at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Bloomington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Selma | Bloomington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.8% (938) | 0.1% (95) |
| High School Diploma | 14.6% (3,577) | 5.8% (4,606) |
| Less than High School | 33.9% (8,285) | 4.2% (3,311) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (1,712) | 29.0% (22,911) |
Education Levels Comparison: Selma vs Bloomington
- A higher percentage of residents in Selma have no formal schooling at 3.8% compared to 0.1% in Bloomington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Selma hold a high school diploma at 14.6% compared to 5.8% in Bloomington.
- More residents in Selma have less than a high school education at 33.9% compared to 4.2% in Bloomington.
- In Bloomington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.0% compared to 7.0% in Selma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.