Demographics details for Sedona, AZ vs Navajo dam, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sedona, AZ vs Navajo dam, NM.
| Data | Sedona | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,790 | 330 |
| Median Age | 58.7 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $62,901 | $63,375 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Sedona vs Navajo dam
- In Sedona, the population is higher at 9,790, compared to 330 in Navajo dam.
- Residents in Sedona have a higher median age of 58.7 years compared to 36.6 years in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has a higher median income of $63,375, compared to $62,901 in Sedona.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sedona at 51.0% compared to 34.0% in Navajo dam.
- The poverty level is higher in Navajo dam at 14%, compared to 10% in Sedona.
- Navajo dam has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.3% in Sedona.
Demographics
Demographics Sedona vs Navajo dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sedona | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 73 | 16 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 19 | 67 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 6 |
Demographics Comparison: Sedona vs Navajo dam
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sedona at 1% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- Sedona has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 16% in Navajo dam.
- The Asian population is larger in Sedona at 3% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 67%, compared to 19% in Sedona.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Navajo dam at 11%, compared to 4% in Sedona.
- In Navajo dam, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 6%, compared to 0% in Sedona.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sedona | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 11.2% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 12.0% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 24.5% | 32.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sedona vs Navajo dam
- In Navajo dam, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 15.0% in Sedona.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sedona at 19.7% compared to 17.8% in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has a higher smoking rate at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Sedona.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sedona at 17.3% compared to 14.1% in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has higher obesity rates at 32.6% compared to 24.5% in Sedona.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Navajo dam at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Sedona.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sedona | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (6) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (1,206) | 4.8% (16) |
| Less than High School | 8.4% (827) | 6.1% (20) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 44.7% (4,375) | 22.7% (75) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sedona vs Navajo dam
- A higher percentage of residents in Sedona have no formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sedona hold a high school diploma at 12.3% compared to 4.8% in Navajo dam.
- More residents in Sedona have less than a high school education at 8.4% compared to 6.1% in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sedona hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.7% compared to 22.7% in Navajo dam.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.