Demographics details for Seattle, WA vs Sneads ferry, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Seattle, WA vs Sneads ferry, NC.
| Data | Seattle | Sneads ferry |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 749,256 | 2,140 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 50.3 years |
| Median Income | $116,068 | $40,278 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Seattle vs Sneads ferry
- In Seattle, the population is higher at 749,256, compared to 2,140 in Sneads ferry.
- The median age in Sneads ferry is higher at 50.3 years, compared to 35.4 years in Seattle.
- Seattle has a higher median income of $116,068 compared to $40,278 in Sneads ferry.
- In Sneads ferry, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 35.0% in Seattle.
- The poverty level is identical in both Seattle and Sneads ferry at 9%.
- The unemployment rate in Seattle is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.5% in Sneads ferry.
Demographics
Demographics Seattle vs Sneads ferry provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Seattle | Sneads ferry |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 1 |
| White | 59 | 89 |
| Asian | 17 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Seattle vs Sneads ferry
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Seattle at 7% compared to 1% in Sneads ferry.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sneads ferry at 89% compared to 59% in Seattle.
- The Asian population is larger in Seattle at 17% compared to 2% in Sneads ferry.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Seattle at 7% compared to 6% in Sneads ferry.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Seattle at 9% compared to 2% in Sneads ferry.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Seattle at 1% compared to 0% in Sneads ferry.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Seattle | Sneads ferry |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 8.6% | 15.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 18.6% |
| Obesity | 23.8% | 33.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Seattle vs Sneads ferry
- In Sneads ferry, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 15.1% in Seattle.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sneads ferry at 23.8% versus 23.6% in Seattle.
- Sneads ferry has a higher smoking rate at 15.1% compared to 8.6% in Seattle.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sneads ferry at 18.6% compared to 17.6% in Seattle.
- Sneads ferry has higher obesity rates at 33.6% compared to 23.8% in Seattle.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sneads ferry at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Seattle.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Seattle | Sneads ferry |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (6,839) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 5.8% (43,106) | 23.2% (496) |
| Less than High School | 4.7% (35,004) | 17.9% (382) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 49.4% (369,798) | 10.2% (219) |
Education Levels Comparison: Seattle vs Sneads ferry
- A higher percentage of residents in Seattle have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Sneads ferry.
- In Sneads ferry, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.2% compared to 5.8% in Seattle.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sneads ferry at 17.9%, compared to 4.7% in Seattle.
- A higher percentage of residents in Seattle hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.4% compared to 10.2% in Sneads ferry.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.