Demographics details for Seattle, WA vs Hartford, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Seattle, WA vs Hartford, CT.
| Data | Seattle | Hartford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 749,256 | 120,686 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 33.1 years |
| Median Income | $116,068 | $41,841 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 19.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Seattle vs Hartford
- In Seattle, the population is higher at 749,256, compared to 120,686 in Hartford.
- Residents in Seattle have a higher median age of 35.4 years compared to 33.1 years in Hartford.
- Seattle has a higher median income of $116,068 compared to $41,841 in Hartford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Seattle at 35.0% compared to 19.0% in Hartford.
- The poverty level is higher in Hartford at 20%, compared to 9% in Seattle.
- Hartford has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.6% in Seattle.
Demographics
Demographics Seattle vs Hartford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Seattle | Hartford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 36 |
| White | 59 | 2 |
| Asian | 17 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 13 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Seattle vs Hartford
- In Hartford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 36% compared to 7% in Seattle.
- Seattle has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to 2% in Hartford.
- The Asian population is larger in Seattle at 17% compared to 2% in Hartford.
- Hartford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 7% in Seattle.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hartford at 13%, compared to 9% in Seattle.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Seattle and Hartford at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Seattle | Hartford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 8.6% | 20.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 12.1% |
| Obesity | 23.8% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Seattle vs Hartford
- In Hartford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 15.1% in Seattle.
- Depression is more prevalent in Seattle at 23.6% compared to 22.6% in Hartford.
- Hartford has a higher smoking rate at 20.2% compared to 8.6% in Seattle.
- Binge drinking is more common in Seattle at 17.6% compared to 12.1% in Hartford.
- Hartford has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 23.8% in Seattle.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hartford at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Seattle.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Seattle | Hartford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (6,839) | 2.9% (3,500) |
| High School Diploma | 5.8% (43,106) | 17.4% (21,002) |
| Less than High School | 4.7% (35,004) | 27.9% (33,618) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 49.4% (369,798) | 11.0% (13,316) |
Education Levels Comparison: Seattle vs Hartford
- In Hartford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.9% in Seattle.
- In Hartford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.4% compared to 5.8% in Seattle.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hartford at 27.9%, compared to 4.7% in Seattle.
- A higher percentage of residents in Seattle hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.4% compared to 11.0% in Hartford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.