Demographics details for Seattle, WA vs Fort lauderdale, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Seattle, WA vs Fort lauderdale, FL.

Data Seattle Fort lauderdale
Population 749,256 183,146
Median Age 35.4 years 43.2 years
Median Income $116,068 $75,376
Married Families 35.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 9% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.6 3.5

Population Comparison: Seattle vs Fort lauderdale

  • In Seattle, the population is higher at 749,256, compared to 183,146 in Fort lauderdale.
  • The median age in Fort lauderdale is higher at 43.2 years, compared to 35.4 years in Seattle.
  • Seattle has a higher median income of $116,068 compared to $75,376 in Fort lauderdale.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Seattle at 35.0% compared to 33.0% in Fort lauderdale.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fort lauderdale at 12%, compared to 9% in Seattle.
  • The unemployment rate in Seattle is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.5% in Fort lauderdale.

Demographics

Demographics Seattle vs Fort lauderdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Seattle Fort lauderdale
Black 7 29
White 59 38
Asian 17 2
Hispanic 7 20
Two or More Races 9 11
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Seattle vs Fort lauderdale

  • In Fort lauderdale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 7% in Seattle.
  • Seattle has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to 38% in Fort lauderdale.
  • The Asian population is larger in Seattle at 17% compared to 2% in Fort lauderdale.
  • Fort lauderdale has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 7% in Seattle.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort lauderdale at 11%, compared to 9% in Seattle.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Seattle at 1% compared to 0% in Fort lauderdale.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Seattle Fort lauderdale
Mental Health Not Good 15.1% 15.6%
Physical Health Not Good 8.5% 10.8%
Depression 23.6% 17.3%
Smoking 8.6% 18.0%
Binge Drinking 17.6% 15.4%
Obesity 23.8% 29.8%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Seattle vs Fort lauderdale

  • In Fort lauderdale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 15.1% in Seattle.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Seattle at 23.6% compared to 17.3% in Fort lauderdale.
  • Fort lauderdale has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 8.6% in Seattle.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Seattle at 17.6% compared to 15.4% in Fort lauderdale.
  • Fort lauderdale has higher obesity rates at 29.8% compared to 23.8% in Seattle.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort lauderdale at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Seattle.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Seattle Fort lauderdale
No Schooling 0.9% (6,839) 1.1% (1,998)
High School Diploma 5.8% (43,106) 16.0% (29,393)
Less than High School 4.7% (35,004) 11.8% (21,537)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 49.4% (369,798) 30.5% (55,791)

Education Levels Comparison: Seattle vs Fort lauderdale

  • In Fort lauderdale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.9% in Seattle.
  • In Fort lauderdale, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 5.8% in Seattle.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort lauderdale at 11.8%, compared to 4.7% in Seattle.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Seattle hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.4% compared to 30.5% in Fort lauderdale.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.