Demographics details for Seattle, WA vs Cherokee, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Seattle, WA vs Cherokee, OK.
| Data | Seattle | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 749,256 | 48,098 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $116,068 | $52,410 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Seattle vs Cherokee
- In Seattle, the population is higher at 749,256, compared to 48,098 in Cherokee.
- The median age in Cherokee is higher at 36.5 years, compared to 35.4 years in Seattle.
- Seattle has a higher median income of $116,068 compared to $52,410 in Cherokee.
- In Cherokee, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 35.0% in Seattle.
- The poverty level is higher in Cherokee at 15%, compared to 9% in Seattle.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Seattle and Cherokee at 4.6%.
Demographics
Demographics Seattle vs Cherokee provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Seattle | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 1 |
| White | 59 | 42 |
| Asian | 17 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 15 |
| American Indian | 1 | 33 |
Demographics Comparison: Seattle vs Cherokee
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Seattle at 7% compared to 1% in Cherokee.
- Seattle has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to 42% in Cherokee.
- The Asian population is larger in Seattle at 17% compared to 1% in Cherokee.
- Cherokee has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 7% in Seattle.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cherokee at 15%, compared to 9% in Seattle.
- In Cherokee, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 33%, compared to 1% in Seattle.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Seattle | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 8.6% | 23.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 23.8% | 43.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Seattle vs Cherokee
- In Cherokee, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 15.1% in Seattle.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cherokee at 26.6% versus 23.6% in Seattle.
- Cherokee has a higher smoking rate at 23.2% compared to 8.6% in Seattle.
- Binge drinking is more common in Seattle at 17.6% compared to 13.8% in Cherokee.
- Cherokee has higher obesity rates at 43.7% compared to 23.8% in Seattle.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cherokee at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Seattle.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Seattle | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (6,839) | 0.9% (433) |
| High School Diploma | 5.8% (43,106) | 15.6% (7,526) |
| Less than High School | 4.7% (35,004) | 11.5% (5,552) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 49.4% (369,798) | 17.9% (8,612) |
Education Levels Comparison: Seattle vs Cherokee
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Seattle and Cherokee at 0.9%.
- In Cherokee, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.6% compared to 5.8% in Seattle.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cherokee at 11.5%, compared to 4.7% in Seattle.
- A higher percentage of residents in Seattle hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.4% compared to 17.9% in Cherokee.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.