Demographics details for Seattle, WA vs Bridgeport, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Seattle, WA vs Bridgeport, AL.
| Data | Seattle | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 749,256 | 2,244 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 44.1 years |
| Median Income | $116,068 | $34,000 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Seattle vs Bridgeport
- In Seattle, the population is higher at 749,256, compared to 2,244 in Bridgeport.
- The median age in Bridgeport is higher at 44.1 years, compared to 35.4 years in Seattle.
- Seattle has a higher median income of $116,068 compared to $34,000 in Bridgeport.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Seattle at 35.0% compared to 33.0% in Bridgeport.
- The poverty level is higher in Bridgeport at 17%, compared to 9% in Seattle.
- The unemployment rate in Seattle is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.5% in Bridgeport.
Demographics
Demographics Seattle vs Bridgeport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Seattle | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 4 |
| White | 59 | 85 |
| Asian | 17 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Seattle vs Bridgeport
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Seattle at 7% compared to 4% in Bridgeport.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bridgeport at 85% compared to 59% in Seattle.
- The Asian population is larger in Seattle at 17% compared to 0% in Bridgeport.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Seattle at 7% compared to 4% in Bridgeport.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Seattle at 9% compared to 6% in Bridgeport.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Seattle and Bridgeport at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Seattle | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 21.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 15.2% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 8.6% | 23.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 23.8% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Seattle vs Bridgeport
- In Bridgeport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 15.1% in Seattle.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bridgeport at 25.7% versus 23.6% in Seattle.
- Bridgeport has a higher smoking rate at 23.7% compared to 8.6% in Seattle.
- Binge drinking is more common in Seattle at 17.6% compared to 14.7% in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 23.8% in Seattle.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bridgeport at 27.0% compared to 9.0% in Seattle.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Seattle | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (6,839) | 5.5% (123) |
| High School Diploma | 5.8% (43,106) | 23.8% (534) |
| Less than High School | 4.7% (35,004) | 26.3% (590) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 49.4% (369,798) | 6.5% (146) |
Education Levels Comparison: Seattle vs Bridgeport
- In Bridgeport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.9% in Seattle.
- In Bridgeport, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.8% compared to 5.8% in Seattle.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bridgeport at 26.3%, compared to 4.7% in Seattle.
- A higher percentage of residents in Seattle hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.4% compared to 6.5% in Bridgeport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.