Demographics details for Seaside, CA vs Grand island, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Seaside, CA vs Grand island, NE.
| Data | Seaside | Grand island |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,478 | 52,513 |
| Median Age | 34.0 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $80,239 | $59,061 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Seaside vs Grand island
- The population in Grand island is higher at 52,513, compared to 31,478 in Seaside.
- The median age in Grand island is higher at 35.0 years, compared to 34.0 years in Seaside.
- Seaside has a higher median income of $80,239 compared to $59,061 in Grand island.
- In Grand island, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 36.0% in Seaside.
- Seaside has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Grand island.
- The unemployment rate in Seaside is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.1% in Grand island.
Demographics
Demographics Seaside vs Grand island provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Seaside | Grand island |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 4 |
| White | 24 | 52 |
| Asian | 11 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 46 | 34 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Seaside vs Grand island
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Seaside at 6% compared to 4% in Grand island.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grand island at 52% compared to 24% in Seaside.
- The Asian population is larger in Seaside at 11% compared to 1% in Grand island.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Seaside at 46% compared to 34% in Grand island.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Seaside at 13% compared to 8% in Grand island.
- In Grand island, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Seaside.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Seaside | Grand island |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 18.8% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 13.4% | 16.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 27.5% | 41.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Seaside vs Grand island
- More residents in Seaside report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 14.2% in Grand island.
- Depression is more prevalent in Seaside at 18.8% compared to 17.0% in Grand island.
- Grand island has a higher smoking rate at 16.8% compared to 13.4% in Seaside.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grand island at 18.2% compared to 15.1% in Seaside.
- Grand island has higher obesity rates at 41.0% compared to 27.5% in Seaside.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grand island at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Seaside.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Seaside | Grand island |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (565) | 2.8% (1,457) |
| High School Diploma | 12.2% (3,848) | 16.6% (8,733) |
| Less than High School | 22.0% (6,935) | 20.3% (10,649) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.5% (5,200) | 13.3% (6,981) |
Education Levels Comparison: Seaside vs Grand island
- In Grand island, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 1.8% in Seaside.
- In Grand island, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.6% compared to 12.2% in Seaside.
- More residents in Seaside have less than a high school education at 22.0% compared to 20.3% in Grand island.
- A higher percentage of residents in Seaside hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 13.3% in Grand island.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.