Demographics details for Seaside, CA vs Clarkesville, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Seaside, CA vs Clarkesville, GA.
| Data | Seaside | Clarkesville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,478 | 2,112 |
| Median Age | 34.0 years | 47.4 years |
| Median Income | $80,239 | $64,848 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Seaside vs Clarkesville
- In Seaside, the population is higher at 31,478, compared to 2,112 in Clarkesville.
- The median age in Clarkesville is higher at 47.4 years, compared to 34.0 years in Seaside.
- Seaside has a higher median income of $80,239 compared to $64,848 in Clarkesville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Seaside at 36.0% compared to 30.0% in Clarkesville.
- Seaside has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 0% in Clarkesville.
- The unemployment rate in Seaside is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.1% in Clarkesville.
Demographics
Demographics Seaside vs Clarkesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Seaside | Clarkesville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 8 |
| White | 24 | 81 |
| Asian | 11 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 46 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Seaside vs Clarkesville
- In Clarkesville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 6% in Seaside.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clarkesville at 81% compared to 24% in Seaside.
- The Asian population is larger in Seaside at 11% compared to 1% in Clarkesville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Seaside at 46% compared to 4% in Clarkesville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Seaside at 13% compared to 6% in Clarkesville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Seaside and Clarkesville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Seaside | Clarkesville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 18.8% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 13.4% | 18.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 27.5% | 31.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Seaside vs Clarkesville
- In Clarkesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.5% in Seaside.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clarkesville at 23.6% versus 18.8% in Seaside.
- Clarkesville has a higher smoking rate at 18.4% compared to 13.4% in Seaside.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clarkesville at 16.3% compared to 15.1% in Seaside.
- Clarkesville has higher obesity rates at 31.5% compared to 27.5% in Seaside.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarkesville at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Seaside.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Seaside | Clarkesville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (565) | 0.3% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 12.2% (3,848) | 16.9% (356) |
| Less than High School | 22.0% (6,935) | 15.2% (322) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.5% (5,200) | 21.4% (453) |
Education Levels Comparison: Seaside vs Clarkesville
- A higher percentage of residents in Seaside have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.3% in Clarkesville.
- In Clarkesville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 12.2% in Seaside.
- More residents in Seaside have less than a high school education at 22.0% compared to 15.2% in Clarkesville.
- In Clarkesville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.4% compared to 16.5% in Seaside.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.