Demographics details for Seaside park, NJ vs Safford, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Seaside park, NJ vs Safford, AZ.
| Data | Seaside park | Safford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,473 | 10,297 |
| Median Age | 59.5 years | 31.6 years |
| Median Income | $80,658 | $64,860 |
| Married Families | 57.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Seaside park vs Safford
- The population in Safford is higher at 10,297, compared to 1,473 in Seaside park.
- Residents in Seaside park have a higher median age of 59.5 years compared to 31.6 years in Safford.
- Seaside park has a higher median income of $80,658 compared to $64,860 in Safford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Seaside park at 57.0% compared to 33.0% in Safford.
- Seaside park has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Safford.
- The unemployment rate in Seaside park is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.5% in Safford.
Demographics
Demographics Seaside park vs Safford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Seaside park | Safford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 2 |
| White | 90 | 31 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 50 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Seaside park vs Safford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Seaside park at 3% compared to 2% in Safford.
- Seaside park has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 31% in Safford.
- The Asian population is larger in Seaside park at 4% compared to 1% in Safford.
- Safford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 50%, compared to 1% in Seaside park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Safford at 15%, compared to 2% in Seaside park.
- In Safford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Seaside park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Seaside park | Safford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 13.2% | 16.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 30.7% | 35.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Seaside park vs Safford
- In Safford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 15.4% in Seaside park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Seaside park at 23.1% compared to 19.9% in Safford.
- Safford has a higher smoking rate at 16.6% compared to 13.2% in Seaside park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Seaside park at 18.2% compared to 17.0% in Safford.
- Safford has higher obesity rates at 35.2% compared to 30.7% in Seaside park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Safford at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Seaside park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Seaside park | Safford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.7% (274) |
| High School Diploma | 22.2% (327) | 11.1% (1,147) |
| Less than High School | 3.3% (49) | 17.7% (1,825) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 56.3% (830) | 10.6% (1,092) |
Education Levels Comparison: Seaside park vs Safford
- In Safford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Seaside park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Seaside park hold a high school diploma at 22.2% compared to 11.1% in Safford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Safford at 17.7%, compared to 3.3% in Seaside park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Seaside park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 56.3% compared to 10.6% in Safford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.