Demographics details for Seaside park, NJ vs Plymouth, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Seaside park, NJ vs Plymouth, PA.
Data | Seaside park | Plymouth |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,473 | 5,751 |
Median Age | 59.5 years | 40.4 years |
Median Income | $80,658 | $46,858 |
Married Families | 57.0% | 26.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Seaside park vs Plymouth
- The population in Plymouth is higher at 5,751, compared to 1,473 in Seaside park.
- Residents in Seaside park have a higher median age of 59.5 years compared to 40.4 years in Plymouth.
- Seaside park has a higher median income of $80,658 compared to $46,858 in Plymouth.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Seaside park at 57.0% compared to 26.0% in Plymouth.
- The poverty level is higher in Plymouth at 12%, compared to 5% in Seaside park.
- Plymouth has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.1% in Seaside park.
Demographics
Demographics Seaside park vs Plymouth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Seaside park | Plymouth |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 9 |
White | 90 | 73 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Seaside park vs Plymouth
- In Plymouth, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 3% in Seaside park.
- Seaside park has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 73% in Plymouth.
- The Asian population is larger in Seaside park at 4% compared to 0% in Plymouth.
- Plymouth has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 1% in Seaside park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Plymouth at 6%, compared to 2% in Seaside park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Seaside park and Plymouth at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Seaside park | Plymouth |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 19.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 14.4% |
Depression | 23.1% | 24.2% |
Smoking | 13.2% | 25.3% |
Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 30.7% | 39.6% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Seaside park vs Plymouth
- In Plymouth, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 15.4% in Seaside park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Plymouth at 24.2% versus 23.1% in Seaside park.
- Plymouth has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 13.2% in Seaside park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Seaside park at 18.2% compared to 16.7% in Plymouth.
- Plymouth has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 30.7% in Seaside park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Plymouth at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Seaside park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Seaside park | Plymouth |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.3% (133) |
High School Diploma | 22.2% (327) | 24.9% (1,432) |
Less than High School | 3.3% (49) | 16.5% (949) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 56.3% (830) | 8.4% (482) |
Education Levels Comparison: Seaside park vs Plymouth
- In Plymouth, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.0% in Seaside park.
- In Plymouth, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.9% compared to 22.2% in Seaside park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Plymouth at 16.5%, compared to 3.3% in Seaside park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Seaside park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 56.3% compared to 8.4% in Plymouth.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.