Demographics details for Seaside park, NJ vs Burnt ranch, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Seaside park, NJ vs Burnt ranch, CA.

Data Seaside park Burnt ranch
Population 1,473 228
Median Age 59.5 years 45.7 years
Median Income $80,658 $55,357
Married Families 57.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 5% 13%
Unemployment Rate 4.1 7.5

Population Comparison: Seaside park vs Burnt ranch

  • In Seaside park, the population is higher at 1,473, compared to 228 in Burnt ranch.
  • Residents in Seaside park have a higher median age of 59.5 years compared to 45.7 years in Burnt ranch.
  • Seaside park has a higher median income of $80,658 compared to $55,357 in Burnt ranch.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Seaside park at 57.0% compared to 36.0% in Burnt ranch.
  • The poverty level is higher in Burnt ranch at 13%, compared to 5% in Seaside park.
  • Burnt ranch has a higher unemployment rate at 7.5% compared to 4.1% in Seaside park.

Demographics

Demographics Seaside park vs Burnt ranch provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Seaside park Burnt ranch
Black 3 Data is updating
White 90 97
Asian 4 Data is updating
Hispanic 1 Data is updating
Two or More Races 2 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Seaside park vs Burnt ranch

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Seaside park at 3% compared to 0% in Burnt ranch.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Burnt ranch at 97% compared to 90% in Seaside park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Seaside park at 4% compared to 0% in Burnt ranch.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Seaside park at 1% compared to 0% in Burnt ranch.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Seaside park at 2% compared to 0% in Burnt ranch.
  • In Burnt ranch, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Seaside park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Seaside park Burnt ranch
Mental Health Not Good 15.4% 16.6%
Physical Health Not Good 10.1% 11.1%
Depression 23.1% 20.0%
Smoking 13.2% 14.8%
Binge Drinking 18.2% 19.5%
Obesity 30.7% 29.9%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Seaside park vs Burnt ranch

  • In Burnt ranch, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.4% in Seaside park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Seaside park at 23.1% compared to 20.0% in Burnt ranch.
  • Burnt ranch has a higher smoking rate at 14.8% compared to 13.2% in Seaside park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Burnt ranch at 19.5% compared to 18.2% in Seaside park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Seaside park at 30.7% compared to 29.9% in Burnt ranch.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Seaside park at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Burnt ranch.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Seaside park Burnt ranch
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 22.2% (327) 11.8% (27)
Less than High School 3.3% (49) 9.6% (22)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 56.3% (830) 18.9% (43)

Education Levels Comparison: Seaside park vs Burnt ranch

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Seaside park and Burnt ranch at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Seaside park hold a high school diploma at 22.2% compared to 11.8% in Burnt ranch.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Burnt ranch at 9.6%, compared to 3.3% in Seaside park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Seaside park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 56.3% compared to 18.9% in Burnt ranch.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.