Demographics details for Scottsdale, AZ vs Gardner, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Scottsdale, AZ vs Gardner, MA.
| Data | Scottsdale | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 243,050 | 20,902 |
| Median Age | 48.4 years | 45.0 years |
| Median Income | $104,197 | $56,974 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Scottsdale vs Gardner
- In Scottsdale, the population is higher at 243,050, compared to 20,902 in Gardner.
- Residents in Scottsdale have a higher median age of 48.4 years compared to 45.0 years in Gardner.
- Scottsdale has a higher median income of $104,197 compared to $56,974 in Gardner.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Scottsdale at 44.0% compared to 38.0% in Gardner.
- The poverty level is identical in both Scottsdale and Gardner at 9%.
- Gardner has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 2.9% in Scottsdale.
Demographics
Demographics Scottsdale vs Gardner provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Scottsdale | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 75 | 82 |
| Asian | 5 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Scottsdale vs Gardner
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Scottsdale and Gardner at 2%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gardner at 82% compared to 75% in Scottsdale.
- The Asian population is larger in Scottsdale at 5% compared to 3% in Gardner.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Scottsdale at 10% compared to 8% in Gardner.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Scottsdale at 7% compared to 5% in Gardner.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Scottsdale at 1% compared to 0% in Gardner.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Scottsdale | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 19.1% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 10.2% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 26.5% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Scottsdale vs Gardner
- In Gardner, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 14.7% in Scottsdale.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gardner at 24.4% versus 19.1% in Scottsdale.
- Gardner has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 10.2% in Scottsdale.
- Binge drinking is more common in Scottsdale at 19.3% compared to 17.6% in Gardner.
- Gardner has higher obesity rates at 33.5% compared to 26.5% in Scottsdale.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gardner at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Scottsdale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Scottsdale | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (1,157) | 1.3% (276) |
| High School Diploma | 7.7% (18,770) | 21.5% (4,487) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (9,724) | 16.8% (3,513) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 47.7% (116,035) | 15.0% (3,133) |
Education Levels Comparison: Scottsdale vs Gardner
- In Gardner, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.5% in Scottsdale.
- In Gardner, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.5% compared to 7.7% in Scottsdale.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gardner at 16.8%, compared to 4.0% in Scottsdale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Scottsdale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.7% compared to 15.0% in Gardner.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.