Demographics details for Scottsboro, AL vs Chickasha, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Scottsboro, AL vs Chickasha, OK.
Data | Scottsboro | Chickasha |
---|---|---|
Population | 15,677 | 16,549 |
Median Age | 41.7 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $49,287 | $55,136 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 17% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Scottsboro vs Chickasha
- The population in Chickasha is higher at 16,549, compared to 15,677 in Scottsboro.
- Residents in Scottsboro have a higher median age of 41.7 years compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher median income of $55,136, compared to $49,287 in Scottsboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Scottsboro at 36.0% compared to 34.0% in Chickasha.
- The poverty level is higher in Chickasha at 17%, compared to 16% in Scottsboro.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Scottsboro and Chickasha at 3.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Scottsboro vs Chickasha provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Scottsboro | Chickasha |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 6 |
White | 88 | 71 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Scottsboro vs Chickasha
- In Chickasha, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 5% in Scottsboro.
- Scottsboro has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 71% in Chickasha.
- The Asian population is larger in Scottsboro at 1% compared to 0% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 3% in Scottsboro.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chickasha at 11%, compared to 3% in Scottsboro.
- In Chickasha, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Scottsboro.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Scottsboro | Chickasha |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 19.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 13.7% |
Depression | 24.9% | 25.4% |
Smoking | 20.6% | 21.8% |
Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 13.8% |
Obesity | 37.5% | 40.8% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Scottsboro vs Chickasha
- More residents in Scottsboro report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 19.1% in Chickasha.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chickasha at 25.4% versus 24.9% in Scottsboro.
- Chickasha has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 20.6% in Scottsboro.
- Binge drinking is more common in Scottsboro at 15.4% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 37.5% in Scottsboro.
- Disability percentages are higher in Scottsboro at 19.0% compared to 18.0% in Chickasha.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Scottsboro | Chickasha |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (218) | 0.5% (78) |
High School Diploma | 19.7% (3,093) | 22.5% (3,730) |
Less than High School | 16.6% (2,597) | 13.1% (2,160) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (2,710) | 12.5% (2,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Scottsboro vs Chickasha
- A higher percentage of residents in Scottsboro have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.5% in Chickasha.
- In Chickasha, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.5% compared to 19.7% in Scottsboro.
- More residents in Scottsboro have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 13.1% in Chickasha.
- A higher percentage of residents in Scottsboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 12.5% in Chickasha.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.