Demographics details for Scottsboro, AL vs Blackfoot, ID
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Scottsboro, AL vs Blackfoot, ID.
Data | Scottsboro | Blackfoot |
---|---|---|
Population | 15,677 | 12,702 |
Median Age | 41.7 years | 34.4 years |
Median Income | $49,287 | $57,951 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Scottsboro vs Blackfoot
- In Scottsboro, the population is higher at 15,677, compared to 12,702 in Blackfoot.
- Residents in Scottsboro have a higher median age of 41.7 years compared to 34.4 years in Blackfoot.
- Blackfoot has a higher median income of $57,951, compared to $49,287 in Scottsboro.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Scottsboro and Blackfoot at 36.0%.
- Scottsboro has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 13% in Blackfoot.
- Blackfoot has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Scottsboro.
Demographics
Demographics Scottsboro vs Blackfoot provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Scottsboro | Blackfoot |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | Data is updating |
White | 88 | 71 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 18 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Scottsboro vs Blackfoot
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Scottsboro at 5% compared to 0% in Blackfoot.
- Scottsboro has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 71% in Blackfoot.
- The Asian population is larger in Scottsboro at 1% compared to 0% in Blackfoot.
- Blackfoot has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 3% in Scottsboro.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Blackfoot at 7%, compared to 3% in Scottsboro.
- In Blackfoot, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Scottsboro.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Scottsboro | Blackfoot |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 16.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 11.6% |
Depression | 24.9% | 24.0% |
Smoking | 20.6% | 15.8% |
Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 14.3% |
Obesity | 37.5% | 36.0% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Scottsboro vs Blackfoot
- More residents in Scottsboro report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 16.0% in Blackfoot.
- Depression is more prevalent in Scottsboro at 24.9% compared to 24.0% in Blackfoot.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Scottsboro at 20.6% compared to 15.8% in Blackfoot.
- Binge drinking is more common in Scottsboro at 15.4% compared to 14.3% in Blackfoot.
- Obesity rates are higher in Scottsboro at 37.5% compared to 36.0% in Blackfoot.
- Disability percentages are higher in Scottsboro at 19.0% compared to 17.0% in Blackfoot.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Scottsboro | Blackfoot |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (218) | 0.1% (16) |
High School Diploma | 19.7% (3,093) | 15.5% (1,974) |
Less than High School | 16.6% (2,597) | 13.2% (1,678) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (2,710) | 13.6% (1,726) |
Education Levels Comparison: Scottsboro vs Blackfoot
- A higher percentage of residents in Scottsboro have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.1% in Blackfoot.
- A higher percentage of residents in Scottsboro hold a high school diploma at 19.7% compared to 15.5% in Blackfoot.
- More residents in Scottsboro have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 13.2% in Blackfoot.
- A higher percentage of residents in Scottsboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 13.6% in Blackfoot.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.