Demographics details for Scottsbluff, NE vs Milford, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Scottsbluff, NE vs Milford, UT.
| Data | Scottsbluff | Milford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,283 | 1,454 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 24.8 years |
| Median Income | $55,744 | $83,783 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.6 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Scottsbluff vs Milford
- In Scottsbluff, the population is higher at 14,283, compared to 1,454 in Milford.
- Residents in Scottsbluff have a higher median age of 35.6 years compared to 24.8 years in Milford.
- Milford has a higher median income of $83,783, compared to $55,744 in Scottsbluff.
- In Milford, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 36.0% in Scottsbluff.
- Scottsbluff has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Milford.
- Milford has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.6% in Scottsbluff.
Demographics
Demographics Scottsbluff vs Milford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Scottsbluff | Milford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 52 | 74 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 30 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 6 |
| American Indian | 4 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Scottsbluff vs Milford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Scottsbluff at 1% compared to 0% in Milford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Milford at 74% compared to 52% in Scottsbluff.
- The Asian population is larger in Scottsbluff at 1% compared to 0% in Milford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Scottsbluff at 30% compared to 19% in Milford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Scottsbluff at 12% compared to 6% in Milford.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Scottsbluff at 4% compared to 1% in Milford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Scottsbluff | Milford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 18.0% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 12.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 13.2% |
| Obesity | 42.3% | 34.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Scottsbluff vs Milford
- In Milford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 15.3% in Scottsbluff.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Milford at 23.5% versus 18.0% in Scottsbluff.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Scottsbluff at 19.5% compared to 12.4% in Milford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Scottsbluff at 17.6% compared to 13.2% in Milford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Scottsbluff at 42.3% compared to 34.2% in Milford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Scottsbluff at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Milford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Scottsbluff | Milford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (156) | 0.3% (5) |
| High School Diploma | 14.4% (2,056) | 14.7% (214) |
| Less than High School | 14.7% (2,100) | 3.1% (45) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.1% (2,588) | 16.8% (244) |
Education Levels Comparison: Scottsbluff vs Milford
- A higher percentage of residents in Scottsbluff have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.3% in Milford.
- In Milford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.7% compared to 14.4% in Scottsbluff.
- More residents in Scottsbluff have less than a high school education at 14.7% compared to 3.1% in Milford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Scottsbluff hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.1% compared to 16.8% in Milford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.