Demographics details for Scottsbluff, NE vs Fontana, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Scottsbluff, NE vs Fontana, CA.
| Data | Scottsbluff | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,283 | 212,475 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $55,744 | $93,230 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.6 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Scottsbluff vs Fontana
- The population in Fontana is higher at 212,475, compared to 14,283 in Scottsbluff.
- Residents in Scottsbluff have a higher median age of 35.6 years compared to 32.6 years in Fontana.
- Fontana has a higher median income of $93,230, compared to $55,744 in Scottsbluff.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Scottsbluff and Fontana at 36.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Fontana at 13%, compared to 11% in Scottsbluff.
- Fontana has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 2.6% in Scottsbluff.
Demographics
Demographics Scottsbluff vs Fontana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Scottsbluff | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 8 |
| White | 52 | 2 |
| Asian | 1 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 68 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 14 |
| American Indian | 4 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Scottsbluff vs Fontana
- In Fontana, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 1% in Scottsbluff.
- Scottsbluff has a higher percentage of White residents at 52% compared to 2% in Fontana.
- In Fontana, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Scottsbluff.
- Fontana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 68%, compared to 30% in Scottsbluff.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fontana at 14%, compared to 12% in Scottsbluff.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Scottsbluff at 4% compared to 1% in Fontana.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Scottsbluff | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 18.0% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 12.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 42.3% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Scottsbluff vs Fontana
- In Fontana, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 15.3% in Scottsbluff.
- Depression is more prevalent in Scottsbluff at 18.0% compared to 17.0% in Fontana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Scottsbluff at 19.5% compared to 12.4% in Fontana.
- Binge drinking is more common in Scottsbluff at 17.6% compared to 15.1% in Fontana.
- Obesity rates are higher in Scottsbluff at 42.3% compared to 38.6% in Fontana.
- Disability percentages are higher in Scottsbluff at 15.0% compared to 8.0% in Fontana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Scottsbluff | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (156) | 2.2% (4,748) |
| High School Diploma | 14.4% (2,056) | 16.3% (34,556) |
| Less than High School | 14.7% (2,100) | 25.3% (53,655) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.1% (2,588) | 12.0% (25,587) |
Education Levels Comparison: Scottsbluff vs Fontana
- In Fontana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 1.1% in Scottsbluff.
- In Fontana, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.3% compared to 14.4% in Scottsbluff.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fontana at 25.3%, compared to 14.7% in Scottsbluff.
- A higher percentage of residents in Scottsbluff hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.1% compared to 12.0% in Fontana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.