Demographics details for Scottsbluff, NE vs Fishers, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Scottsbluff, NE vs Fishers, IN.
| Data | Scottsbluff | Fishers |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,283 | 101,966 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $55,744 | $126,548 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Scottsbluff vs Fishers
- The population in Fishers is higher at 101,966, compared to 14,283 in Scottsbluff.
- The median age in Fishers is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 35.6 years in Scottsbluff.
- Fishers has a higher median income of $126,548, compared to $55,744 in Scottsbluff.
- In Fishers, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 36.0% in Scottsbluff.
- Scottsbluff has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in Fishers.
- Fishers has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.6% in Scottsbluff.
Demographics
Demographics Scottsbluff vs Fishers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Scottsbluff | Fishers |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 5 |
| White | 52 | 80 |
| Asian | 1 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 4 |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Scottsbluff vs Fishers
- In Fishers, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Scottsbluff.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fishers at 80% compared to 52% in Scottsbluff.
- In Fishers, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 1% in Scottsbluff.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Scottsbluff at 30% compared to 3% in Fishers.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Scottsbluff at 12% compared to 4% in Fishers.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Scottsbluff at 4% compared to 0% in Fishers.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Scottsbluff | Fishers |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 7.1% |
| Depression | 18.0% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 9.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 42.3% | 27.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Scottsbluff vs Fishers
- More residents in Scottsbluff report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 12.5% in Fishers.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fishers at 22.2% versus 18.0% in Scottsbluff.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Scottsbluff at 19.5% compared to 9.4% in Fishers.
- Binge drinking is more common in Scottsbluff at 17.6% compared to 17.0% in Fishers.
- Obesity rates are higher in Scottsbluff at 42.3% compared to 27.8% in Fishers.
- Disability percentages are higher in Scottsbluff at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in Fishers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Scottsbluff | Fishers |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (156) | 0.4% (418) |
| High School Diploma | 14.4% (2,056) | 6.5% (6,652) |
| Less than High School | 14.7% (2,100) | 2.0% (2,037) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.1% (2,588) | 41.2% (42,051) |
Education Levels Comparison: Scottsbluff vs Fishers
- A higher percentage of residents in Scottsbluff have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Fishers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Scottsbluff hold a high school diploma at 14.4% compared to 6.5% in Fishers.
- More residents in Scottsbluff have less than a high school education at 14.7% compared to 2.0% in Fishers.
- In Fishers, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.2% compared to 18.1% in Scottsbluff.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.