Demographics details for Scottsbluff, NE vs Dawson, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Scottsbluff, NE vs Dawson, GA.
| Data | Scottsbluff | Dawson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,283 | 30,138 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 43.9 years |
| Median Income | $55,744 | $84,516 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.6 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Scottsbluff vs Dawson
- The population in Dawson is higher at 30,138, compared to 14,283 in Scottsbluff.
- The median age in Dawson is higher at 43.9 years, compared to 35.6 years in Scottsbluff.
- Dawson has a higher median income of $84,516, compared to $55,744 in Scottsbluff.
- In Dawson, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 36.0% in Scottsbluff.
- The poverty level is higher in Dawson at 16%, compared to 11% in Scottsbluff.
- Dawson has a higher unemployment rate at 3.4% compared to 2.6% in Scottsbluff.
Demographics
Demographics Scottsbluff vs Dawson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Scottsbluff | Dawson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 52 | 88 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 5 |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Scottsbluff vs Dawson
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Scottsbluff and Dawson at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Dawson at 88% compared to 52% in Scottsbluff.
- Both Scottsbluff and Dawson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Scottsbluff at 30% compared to 5% in Dawson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Scottsbluff at 12% compared to 5% in Dawson.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Scottsbluff at 4% compared to 0% in Dawson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Scottsbluff | Dawson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 18.0% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 14.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 42.3% | 32.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Scottsbluff vs Dawson
- In Dawson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 15.3% in Scottsbluff.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Dawson at 22.1% versus 18.0% in Scottsbluff.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Scottsbluff at 19.5% compared to 14.7% in Dawson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Dawson at 18.3% compared to 17.6% in Scottsbluff.
- Obesity rates are higher in Scottsbluff at 42.3% compared to 32.5% in Dawson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Scottsbluff at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Dawson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Scottsbluff | Dawson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (156) | 1.5% (446) |
| High School Diploma | 14.4% (2,056) | 11.2% (3,376) |
| Less than High School | 14.7% (2,100) | 15.3% (4,610) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.1% (2,588) | 23.0% (6,943) |
Education Levels Comparison: Scottsbluff vs Dawson
- In Dawson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 1.1% in Scottsbluff.
- A higher percentage of residents in Scottsbluff hold a high school diploma at 14.4% compared to 11.2% in Dawson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Dawson at 15.3%, compared to 14.7% in Scottsbluff.
- In Dawson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 18.1% in Scottsbluff.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.