Demographics details for Scottsbluff, NE vs Cuba city, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Scottsbluff, NE vs Cuba city, WI.
Data | Scottsbluff | Cuba city |
---|---|---|
Population | 14,283 | 2,125 |
Median Age | 35.6 years | 39.4 years |
Median Income | $55,744 | $73,393 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 2.6 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Scottsbluff vs Cuba city
- In Scottsbluff, the population is higher at 14,283, compared to 2,125 in Cuba city.
- The median age in Cuba city is higher at 39.4 years, compared to 35.6 years in Scottsbluff.
- Cuba city has a higher median income of $73,393, compared to $55,744 in Scottsbluff.
- In Cuba city, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 36.0% in Scottsbluff.
- Scottsbluff has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 0% in Cuba city.
- Cuba city has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.6% in Scottsbluff.
Demographics
Demographics Scottsbluff vs Cuba city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Scottsbluff | Cuba city |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 52 | 95 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 30 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 2 |
American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Scottsbluff vs Cuba city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Scottsbluff at 1% compared to 0% in Cuba city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cuba city at 95% compared to 52% in Scottsbluff.
- The Asian population is larger in Scottsbluff at 1% compared to 0% in Cuba city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Scottsbluff at 30% compared to 3% in Cuba city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Scottsbluff at 12% compared to 2% in Cuba city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Scottsbluff at 4% compared to 0% in Cuba city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Scottsbluff | Cuba city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 15.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 9.9% |
Depression | 18.0% | 23.3% |
Smoking | 19.5% | 15.8% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 24.6% |
Obesity | 42.3% | 33.0% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Scottsbluff vs Cuba city
- More residents in Scottsbluff report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 15.1% in Cuba city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cuba city at 23.3% versus 18.0% in Scottsbluff.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Scottsbluff at 19.5% compared to 15.8% in Cuba city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cuba city at 24.6% compared to 17.6% in Scottsbluff.
- Obesity rates are higher in Scottsbluff at 42.3% compared to 33.0% in Cuba city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Scottsbluff at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Cuba city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Scottsbluff | Cuba city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (156) | 0.2% (4) |
High School Diploma | 14.4% (2,056) | 18.4% (390) |
Less than High School | 14.7% (2,100) | 9.2% (195) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.1% (2,588) | 19.1% (405) |
Education Levels Comparison: Scottsbluff vs Cuba city
- A higher percentage of residents in Scottsbluff have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.2% in Cuba city.
- In Cuba city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 14.4% in Scottsbluff.
- More residents in Scottsbluff have less than a high school education at 14.7% compared to 9.2% in Cuba city.
- In Cuba city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 18.1% in Scottsbluff.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.