Environment details: Scott city MO
Fair quality; generally safe.
Environment details: Roanoke rapids NC
moderate quality, needs routine checks.
Compare Environment: Scott city MO vs Roanoke rapids NC
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Scott city | Roanoke rapids |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 936 | 925 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Fair quality; generally safe. | moderate quality, needs routine checks. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.71 | 1.62 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 38 | 32 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Scott city vs Roanoke rapids
- Both cities report the same water quality at 6/10.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Scott city with 1.71 compared to 1.62 in Roanoke rapids.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Scott city at 38 compared to 32 in Roanoke rapids.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.