Environment details: Scott city MO
Fair quality; generally safe.
Environment details: Hilmar CA
Water quality is fair due to local runoff.
Compare Environment: Scott city MO vs Hilmar CA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Scott city | Hilmar |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 936 | 2592 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 4/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Fair quality; generally safe. | Water quality is fair due to local runoff. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.71 | 2.13 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 38 | 106 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Scott city vs Hilmar
- Water quality is rated higher in Scott city at 6/10 compared to 4/10 in Hilmar.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Hilmar with an average index of 2.13 compared to 1.71 in Scott city.
- Hilmar experiences more days with poor air quality at 106 compared to 38 in Scott city.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.