Demographics details for Scott city, MO vs Hancock, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Scott city, MO vs Hancock, MN.

Data Scott city Hancock
Population 4,350 857
Median Age 40.1 years 35.9 years
Median Income $57,771 $67,019
Married Families 43.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 9% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Scott city vs Hancock

  • In Scott city, the population is higher at 4,350, compared to 857 in Hancock.
  • Residents in Scott city have a higher median age of 40.1 years compared to 35.9 years in Hancock.
  • Hancock has a higher median income of $67,019, compared to $57,771 in Scott city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Scott city at 43.0% compared to 40.0% in Hancock.
  • Scott city has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Hancock.
  • Hancock has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Scott city.

Demographics

Demographics Scott city vs Hancock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Scott city Hancock
Black Data is updating 1
White 92 87
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 3 6
Two or More Races 5 4
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Scott city vs Hancock

  • In Hancock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Scott city.
  • Scott city has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 87% in Hancock.
  • In Hancock, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Scott city.
  • Hancock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 3% in Scott city.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Scott city at 5% compared to 4% in Hancock.
  • In Hancock, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Scott city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Scott city Hancock
Mental Health Not Good 20.9% 14.8%
Physical Health Not Good 15.5% 9.2%
Depression 27.3% 24.1%
Smoking 26.0% 17.2%
Binge Drinking 17.0% 20.9%
Obesity 37.0% 33.6%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 6.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Scott city vs Hancock

  • More residents in Scott city report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 14.8% in Hancock.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Scott city at 27.3% compared to 24.1% in Hancock.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Scott city at 26.0% compared to 17.2% in Hancock.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Hancock at 20.9% compared to 17.0% in Scott city.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Scott city at 37.0% compared to 33.6% in Hancock.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Scott city at 16.0% compared to 6.0% in Hancock.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Scott city Hancock
No Schooling 0.4% (18) 0.5% (4)
High School Diploma 20.4% (886) 20.9% (179)
Less than High School 23.8% (1,035) 6.0% (51)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.9% (474) 7.2% (62)

Education Levels Comparison: Scott city vs Hancock

  • In Hancock, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Scott city.
  • In Hancock, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.9% compared to 20.4% in Scott city.
  • More residents in Scott city have less than a high school education at 23.8% compared to 6.0% in Hancock.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Scott city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 7.2% in Hancock.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.