Demographics details for Scott city, MO vs Friendship, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Scott city, MO vs Friendship, WI.
| Data | Scott city | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,350 | 681 |
| Median Age | 40.1 years | 50.3 years |
| Median Income | $57,771 | $45,208 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Scott city vs Friendship
- In Scott city, the population is higher at 4,350, compared to 681 in Friendship.
- The median age in Friendship is higher at 50.3 years, compared to 40.1 years in Scott city.
- Scott city has a higher median income of $57,771 compared to $45,208 in Friendship.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Scott city at 43.0% compared to 33.0% in Friendship.
- The poverty level is higher in Friendship at 12%, compared to 9% in Scott city.
- Friendship has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Scott city.
Demographics
Demographics Scott city vs Friendship provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Scott city | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 92 | 84 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Scott city vs Friendship
- In Friendship, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Scott city.
- Scott city has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 84% in Friendship.
- Both Scott city and Friendship have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Scott city at 3% compared to 1% in Friendship.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Friendship at 9%, compared to 5% in Scott city.
- In Friendship, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Scott city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Scott city | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.9% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 27.3% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 26.0% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 23.9% |
| Obesity | 37.0% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Scott city vs Friendship
- More residents in Scott city report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 17.1% in Friendship.
- Depression is more prevalent in Scott city at 27.3% compared to 24.3% in Friendship.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Scott city at 26.0% compared to 21.6% in Friendship.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Friendship at 23.9% compared to 17.0% in Scott city.
- Friendship has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 37.0% in Scott city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Scott city at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Friendship.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Scott city | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (18) | 0.4% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 20.4% (886) | 26.9% (183) |
| Less than High School | 23.8% (1,035) | 26.0% (177) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (474) | 3.2% (22) |
Education Levels Comparison: Scott city vs Friendship
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Scott city and Friendship at 0.4%.
- In Friendship, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 20.4% in Scott city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Friendship at 26.0%, compared to 23.8% in Scott city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Scott city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 3.2% in Friendship.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.