Demographics details for Scott city, MO vs Bridgeport, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Scott city, MO vs Bridgeport, TX.
| Data | Scott city | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,350 | 6,321 |
| Median Age | 40.1 years | 33.9 years |
| Median Income | $57,771 | $96,231 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Scott city vs Bridgeport
- The population in Bridgeport is higher at 6,321, compared to 4,350 in Scott city.
- Residents in Scott city have a higher median age of 40.1 years compared to 33.9 years in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher median income of $96,231, compared to $57,771 in Scott city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Scott city at 43.0% compared to 38.0% in Bridgeport.
- The poverty level is higher in Bridgeport at 10%, compared to 9% in Scott city.
- Bridgeport has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Scott city.
Demographics
Demographics Scott city vs Bridgeport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Scott city | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 92 | 51 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 36 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Scott city vs Bridgeport
- In Bridgeport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Scott city.
- Scott city has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 51% in Bridgeport.
- In Bridgeport, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Scott city.
- Bridgeport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 3% in Scott city.
- Both Scott city and Bridgeport have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- In Bridgeport, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Scott city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Scott city | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.9% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 27.3% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 26.0% | 20.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 17.2% |
| Obesity | 37.0% | 40.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Scott city vs Bridgeport
- More residents in Scott city report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 18.6% in Bridgeport.
- Depression is more prevalent in Scott city at 27.3% compared to 24.0% in Bridgeport.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Scott city at 26.0% compared to 20.2% in Bridgeport.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bridgeport at 17.2% compared to 17.0% in Scott city.
- Bridgeport has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 37.0% in Scott city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Scott city at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Bridgeport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Scott city | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (18) | 0.4% (24) |
| High School Diploma | 20.4% (886) | 11.2% (708) |
| Less than High School | 23.8% (1,035) | 18.8% (1,189) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (474) | 17.2% (1,086) |
Education Levels Comparison: Scott city vs Bridgeport
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Scott city and Bridgeport at 0.4%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Scott city hold a high school diploma at 20.4% compared to 11.2% in Bridgeport.
- More residents in Scott city have less than a high school education at 23.8% compared to 18.8% in Bridgeport.
- In Bridgeport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 10.9% in Scott city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.