Demographics details for Scotia, CA vs Forest park, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Scotia, CA vs Forest park, GA.
| Data | Scotia | Forest park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 510 | 19,400 |
| Median Age | 31.9 years | 31.3 years |
| Median Income | $61,250 | $41,837 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Scotia vs Forest park
- The population in Forest park is higher at 19,400, compared to 510 in Scotia.
- Residents in Scotia have a higher median age of 31.9 years compared to 31.3 years in Forest park.
- Scotia has a higher median income of $61,250 compared to $41,837 in Forest park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Scotia at 26.0% compared to 23.0% in Forest park.
- Scotia has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Forest park.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Scotia and Forest park at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Scotia vs Forest park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Scotia | Forest park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 55 |
| White | 67 | 8 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 25 | 8 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Scotia vs Forest park
- In Forest park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 55% compared to 0% in Scotia.
- Scotia has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 8% in Forest park.
- In Forest park, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Scotia.
- Forest park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 6% in Scotia.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Scotia at 25% compared to 8% in Forest park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Scotia at 2% compared to 0% in Forest park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Scotia | Forest park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 16.0% |
| Depression | 23.0% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 15.3% | 22.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 13.3% |
| Obesity | 32.6% | 43.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Scotia vs Forest park
- In Forest park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 18.1% in Scotia.
- Depression is more prevalent in Scotia at 23.0% compared to 17.8% in Forest park.
- Forest park has a higher smoking rate at 22.7% compared to 15.3% in Scotia.
- Binge drinking is more common in Scotia at 19.2% compared to 13.3% in Forest park.
- Forest park has higher obesity rates at 43.0% compared to 32.6% in Scotia.
- Disability percentages are higher in Scotia at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Forest park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Scotia | Forest park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.6% (504) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (67) | 18.4% (3,567) |
| Less than High School | 3.1% (16) | 21.7% (4,202) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.3% (78) | 6.4% (1,235) |
Education Levels Comparison: Scotia vs Forest park
- In Forest park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.0% in Scotia.
- In Forest park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 13.1% in Scotia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Forest park at 21.7%, compared to 3.1% in Scotia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Scotia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.3% compared to 6.4% in Forest park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.