Demographics details for Scotia, CA vs Forest lake, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Scotia, CA vs Forest lake, MN.
Data | Scotia | Forest lake |
---|---|---|
Population | 510 | 20,857 |
Median Age | 31.9 years | 37.9 years |
Median Income | $61,250 | $91,157 |
Married Families | 26.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Scotia vs Forest lake
- The population in Forest lake is higher at 20,857, compared to 510 in Scotia.
- The median age in Forest lake is higher at 37.9 years, compared to 31.9 years in Scotia.
- Forest lake has a higher median income of $91,157, compared to $61,250 in Scotia.
- In Forest lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 26.0% in Scotia.
- Scotia has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- The unemployment rate in Scotia is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Forest lake.
Demographics
Demographics Scotia vs Forest lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Scotia | Forest lake |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 3 |
White | 67 | 81 |
Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
Hispanic | 6 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 25 | 6 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Scotia vs Forest lake
- In Forest lake, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Scotia.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Forest lake at 81% compared to 67% in Scotia.
- In Forest lake, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Scotia.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Scotia and Forest lake at 6%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Scotia at 25% compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Scotia at 2% compared to 0% in Forest lake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Scotia | Forest lake |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 14.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 8.8% |
Depression | 23.0% | 24.1% |
Smoking | 15.3% | 15.7% |
Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 21.4% |
Obesity | 32.6% | 32.9% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Scotia vs Forest lake
- More residents in Scotia report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 14.7% in Forest lake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Forest lake at 24.1% versus 23.0% in Scotia.
- Forest lake has a higher smoking rate at 15.7% compared to 15.3% in Scotia.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Forest lake at 21.4% compared to 19.2% in Scotia.
- Forest lake has higher obesity rates at 32.9% compared to 32.6% in Scotia.
- Disability percentages are higher in Scotia at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Forest lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Scotia | Forest lake |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (101) |
High School Diploma | 13.1% (67) | 14.6% (3,055) |
Less than High School | 3.1% (16) | 7.7% (1,615) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.3% (78) | 24.6% (5,123) |
Education Levels Comparison: Scotia vs Forest lake
- In Forest lake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Scotia.
- In Forest lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.6% compared to 13.1% in Scotia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Forest lake at 7.7%, compared to 3.1% in Scotia.
- In Forest lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.6% compared to 15.3% in Scotia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.