Environment details: Scotia CA
water quality is poor, significant contaminants found.
Environment details: Burbank WA
Moderate quality; sensible oversight needed.
Compare Environment: Scotia CA vs Burbank WA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Scotia | Burbank |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 2592 | 590 |
| Water Quality | 3/10 | 5/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | water quality is poor, significant contaminants found. | Moderate quality; sensible oversight needed. |
| Median Air Quality | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.46 | 1.73 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 5 | 46 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Scotia vs Burbank
- The water quality in Burbank is superior at 5/10 compared to 3/10 in Scotia.
- Burbank has a better median air quality index at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Scotia.
- Air quality is better in Burbank with an average index of 1.73 compared to 1.46 in Scotia.
- Burbank experiences more days with poor air quality at 46 compared to 5 in Scotia.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.