Demographics details for Science hill, KY vs Callaway, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Science hill, KY vs Callaway, MN.
Data | Science hill | Callaway |
---|---|---|
Population | 656 | 173 |
Median Age | 33.1 years | 39.9 years |
Median Income | $36,250 | $50,000 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 49.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Science hill vs Callaway
- In Science hill, the population is higher at 656, compared to 173 in Callaway.
- The median age in Callaway is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 33.1 years in Science hill.
- Callaway has a higher median income of $50,000, compared to $36,250 in Science hill.
- In Callaway, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 37.0% in Science hill.
- Science hill has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 8% in Callaway.
- The unemployment rate in Science hill is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.2% in Callaway.
Demographics
Demographics Science hill vs Callaway provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Science hill | Callaway |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 95 | 46 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 16 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 33 |
Demographics Comparison: Science hill vs Callaway
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Science hill and Callaway at 0%.
- Science hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 46% in Callaway.
- Both Science hill and Callaway have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Callaway has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Science hill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Callaway at 16%, compared to 3% in Science hill.
- In Callaway, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 33%, compared to 0% in Science hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Science hill | Callaway |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.2% | 18.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.8% | 12.7% |
Depression | 31.5% | 26.1% |
Smoking | 26.0% | 27.4% |
Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 20.5% |
Obesity | 39.6% | 47.8% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Science hill vs Callaway
- More residents in Science hill report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 18.8% in Callaway.
- Depression is more prevalent in Science hill at 31.5% compared to 26.1% in Callaway.
- Callaway has a higher smoking rate at 27.4% compared to 26.0% in Science hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Callaway at 20.5% compared to 14.1% in Science hill.
- Callaway has higher obesity rates at 47.8% compared to 39.6% in Science hill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Callaway at 28.0% compared to 23.0% in Science hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Science hill | Callaway |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (3) | 0.6% (1) |
High School Diploma | 12.8% (84) | 27.2% (47) |
Less than High School | 19.8% (130) | 22.0% (38) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.5% (62) | 14.5% (25) |
Education Levels Comparison: Science hill vs Callaway
- In Callaway, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Science hill.
- In Callaway, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.2% compared to 12.8% in Science hill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Callaway at 22.0%, compared to 19.8% in Science hill.
- In Callaway, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 9.5% in Science hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.